My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1997/10/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Agenda Packets - 1997/10/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:45 PM
Creation date
6/29/2018 7:06:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/27/1997
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/27/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNAPPRO'JED Page4 <br /> October 13, 1997 <br /> Mounds View City Council <br /> 1 Ms.Haake asked that the City Council consider repair/resurface Spring Lake Road and County Road I using <br /> 2 only the allotted funds available from the Ramsey County Tumback Funds,and built the roadways entirely <br /> 3 within that budget,and that Mounds View does not pursue MSA designation for the entire length of Spring <br /> 4 Lake Road from County Road J to County Road H2. She noted that if Mounds View insists upon a more <br /> 5 sophisticated roadway than what the residents want,they should delay the reconstruction of Spring Lake Road <br /> 6 and County Road I until they develop a 10 year roadway capital master plan for the entire city with funding <br /> 7 mechanisms to achieve the long term solution for all of the system. She also asked that Mounds View appeal <br /> 8 to MNDOT to allow MSA funding to be used for all roadways within the city or to change the MNDOT <br /> 9 restrictive MSA suburban/urban design criteria to allow for water quality/quantity standards to be applied. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Mayor McCarty noted that the city is working on a master capital improvements plan and after they understand <br /> 12 the needs city-wide,the costs can be looked at to determine the best funding mechanism for those needs, <br /> 13 including the possibility of a bond. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Council member Stigney noted that the assessment area was reduced approximately 40%from the original <br /> 16 proposal and asked why this was so. Mr.Peters explained that originally they were looking at areas that <br /> 17 contributed to the lateral system as well but when looking more closely at the city's policy it was noted that <br /> 18 lateral improvements are paid for by the city. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to accept the feasibility study for the reconstruction of Spring Lake <br /> 21 Road and County Road I,with an amendment to include SEH File A-MOUND9706. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> 24 <br /> 25 C. Consideration of Resolution No.5158,Setting a Public Hearing for November 25,1997 at 7:05 p.m., <br /> 26 to Consider the Reconstruction of Spring Lake Road and County Road L <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Mr.Ulrich noted a typographical error in the date of the Public Hearing. The date should be changed to <br /> 29 November 24,1997. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Koopmeiners to Approve Resolution No.5158,Setting a Public Hearing for <br /> 32 November 24,1997 at 7:05 p.m.,to Consider the Reconstruction of Spring Lake Road and County Road I. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> 35 <br /> 36 D. Consideration of Approval of Final Schematic Design for Phase II of the Mounds View Community <br /> 37 Center. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Cathy Bennett introduced Dean Olson with WAI Continuum who was present to discuss the final schematic <br /> 40 plans for Phase II of the Community Center. He noted the changes that have been made to the plan since the <br /> 41 September 15th meeting. He noted that additional storage has been provided behind the bleachers in the <br /> 42 gymnasium. Diagrams were presented to show the floor plan as well as the exterior which is proposed for the <br /> 43 building and Mr. Olson presented a proposed schedule,assuming approval of the final schematic design. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Council member Quick asked if the gymnasium has adequate storage space. He noted that by moving one <br /> 46 wall,an additional 95 foot X 6 foot storage space could be added. He asked how much it would cost to move <br /> 47 the wall to provide this additional space. Mr. Olson estimated that this would run approximately$75/square <br /> 48 foot. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.