Laserfiche WebLink
--::`{r.!'-.'''..4,:-- 7:414:,i;-..1;-----,3._Yi <br /> C� /Sveeitder‘7991 ¢$ 67' <br /> Peira , �eleiait :sl tio/t 4' m ti 4�ol�ee'ado' <br /> access ���, <br /> - <br /> /row is tie tiore to /66 our G4 Y. cfe ra tol aidRelotwefftatiefre�� <br /> ow is the time for all good community producers and same thing. <br /> volunteers to come to the aid of public access!!! If Sample letters were included <br /> in the S. 2195 mailing to <br /> you believe in the concept of public access and you community producers and volunteers. We have also put the <br /> want to preserve not just channel capacity for your program- letters on disk here if you want to use our computers to write <br /> ming,but the equipment and facilities to produce it,then you your letters, and we have post cards you can send. <br /> must act immediately. S. 2195 is the only legislation that This legislation is expected to move this summer,possi- <br /> specifically requires telecommunications providers—whether bly in July, so please don't wait. <br /> cable or telephone company — to set aside capacity and A bit of good news....The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in <br /> funding support for public use of their networks. Unless late in June on a case brought by Turner Broadcasting against <br /> Senators Durenberger and Wellstone hear from you, how- the F.C.C. on the "must carry"rules. In a key decision, the <br /> ever,and not from those of us whose salaries are paid by the Court upheld the right of the government to regulate cable <br /> access facility, this bill is dead in the water. companies. The cable industry has long argued that it should <br /> The U.S. House of Representaties has already passed a have the same First Amendment rights to freedom of speech <br /> bill, H.R. 3636, that would eliminate franchises for cable that are enjoyed by newspapers. If that position had prevailed, <br /> companies. Right now,the only reason that public access or franchises and public access requirements would be consid- <br /> any other community channels exist is because they have ered unconstitutional. <br /> been required in a cable franchise. So,if cable franchises are The Court instead ruled that cable companies are more <br /> invalidated by federal law, the requirement that a company like broadcasters, using a limited public resource to transmit <br /> provide community access will also be invalidated unless their message. In the case of broadcasters,the resource is the <br /> another federal law, like that proposed in S. 2195, re-estab- electronic spectrum; in the case of cable companies, the <br /> lishes the requirement. resource is the public rights-of-way. Therefore, the govern- <br /> Here's what we think will happen. If enough community ment has a legiti- <br /> support from people like you is generated for S. 2195, it will mate obligation to //�� / p <br /> likely be amended to S. 1822, the Senate companion bill to promulgate regula- (io7tactt.LPse J <br /> H.R. 3636. Although it is considered a companion bill, S. tions to manage the p <br /> 1822 is actually more favorable to cities on the issue of resource in the pub- crCirato/€1S'OW/ <br /> franchising. If S. 1822 is approved by the Senate, then a lic interest that <br /> Conference Committee composed of members of the House supercedes the cable Senator154 Dave DurenbergBr <br /> and Senate will be formed to negotiateW <br /> a compromise between companies'freedom Russ on Senate 20510e Bldg. <br /> H.R. 3636 and S. 1822. The stronger the support for the of speech. Washington D.C., <br /> (202) 224-3244 <br /> language in S. 2195, the more likely it is to survive the The decision <br /> conference committee process. <br /> does not give the Senator Paul Wellstone <br /> Unfortunately, members of the Minnesota delegation government at an <br /> y have told us that they haven't heard from anyone other than level the authorityto 717 HartnSenate Office20Bldg. <br /> staff persons on this issue. For this effort to be successful,they establish anyregu- Washington D.C., 20510 <br /> have to hear from you. What should you do? ont g (202) 224-5641 <br /> 1. Call or write Senators Wellstone and Durenberger and rules must be tied wants. The <br /> ask them to support S.2195. Suggest that they sign on as a co- the public interest. It 722 Senator Daniel OfficeKInouye <br /> sponsor. Tell them how you have used public access and/or does, however, af- Washington2 Hart Senate 20Bldg. <br /> how it has benefitted you or your organization. D.C., 20510 <br /> b firm the concept of <br /> 2. Write to Senators Inouye and Hollings. Tell them you regulation of cable <br /> support S.2195 and,again,explain how you have used public companies in gen- Senator125 Earnest Hollings <br /> access and/or how it has benefitted you or your organization. eral. Washington RusselSenate 20510Offie Bldg. <br /> 3. Call or write your U.S.Representative and tell them the D.C., <br /> —Coralie Wilson <br /> 7 : <br />