My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-1994 CC
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
08-08-1994 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2018 8:38:00 AM
Creation date
7/2/2018 8:37:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/8/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the airport that was of concern to Mounds View, he would like us to call him. His <br /> number if 537-2058 or 726-5111. <br /> Because of the misinformation that appears to be "out there" in regards to the airport, <br /> I asked both Jack Eberlein and Mark Ryan, MAC'sairport planner, to attend the <br /> October Work Session. They will update the Council on the plans proposed for the <br /> airport and answer any questions regarding the potential impact of the tower and <br /> proposed duel runways. <br /> The Airports Advisory Committee has requested that the City of Mounds View select <br /> two residents, who oppose any changes to the airport or who have had on-going <br /> concerns about airport activities, to participate in the committee discussions. The <br /> next meeting of the committee will be in October so the Council has plenty of time to <br /> consider naming two individuals. This item will be placed on the September work <br /> session agenda. <br /> Yesterday, Mayor Linke, Councilmember Blanchard, Tim C., Cathy and myself had <br /> lunch with Jim Casserly and Tim Nelson. The lunch had been scheduled so that the <br /> name of the mysterious company could be released. It was not divulged. It appeared <br /> that Everest was once again testing the water for the construction of the "spec." <br /> building, Building "N". The reason they gave for not divulging the name was a signed <br /> confidentiality agreement. However, I asked Cathy to call area cities to see if they <br /> were being "courted" by a broker or developer who would not name the company, <br /> but described it as a high tech manufacturing company. The answer was no in all <br /> cities. The message conveyed to Everest by Mayor Linke and Councilmember <br /> Blanchard was that TIF assistance will not be considered unless the next <br /> development in the business park is owner-occupied or the a long term (10 years or <br /> more) lease whereby the company is named. <br /> Everest <br /> Yesterday, after we returned, Paul Harrington received a call from Tim Nelson asking <br /> when would be the earliest date plans for Building N could be brought to the <br /> Planning Commission. Once again, so there will not be any misunderstanding as to <br /> the Council's position, Cathy will draft a letter to Everest restating that position. <br /> Well, the California girl is going home! Tommy, Todd and I leave tomorrow morning <br /> at 7:30 a.m. (yes, a.m I cannot guarantee that I will be awake, lucid, coherent or <br /> mobile, but I will be at the airport on time). Todd and I are traveling on one place, <br /> Tommy on another. We each have layovers in different cities, so it will be interesting if <br /> we actually end up in California together. <br /> Council, thank you for allowing the extended vacation...I can't remember ever having <br /> 3 weeks at one time. We are all looking forward to seeing everyone (last year, we <br /> only had 5 days and missed many relatives, and you know how upset relatives get if <br /> you don't see each and every one of them. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.