My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1995/07/17
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
Agenda Packets - 1995/07/17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:03 PM
Creation date
7/2/2018 9:38:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/17/1995
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/17/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
UNA131"1:1 (TUTID <br /> Mounds View City Council Page 10 <br /> Regular Meeting June 26, 1995 <br /> 1 B. Consideration of Action on Ordinance 560 Adopting the <br /> 2 Assessment Policy <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Mayor Linke read the revisions the Council directed at the <br /> 5 June 12, 1995, meeting which were to be incorporated into the <br /> 6 proposed assessment policy by the City Attorney. The first <br /> 7 revision dealt with petitions initiated by property owners and <br /> 8 the second dealt with developer requests. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Mike Ulrich, Director of Public Works, reiterated the <br /> 11 revisions and advised Page 20, regarding residential street <br /> 12 design, was inadvertently omitted. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Councilmember Trude pointed out the attorney's recommendations <br /> 15 regarding holding public hearings are not included in the <br /> 16 draft. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Councilmember Hankner requested future drafts show revisions <br /> 19 by crossing out, or redlining, language to be deleted and <br /> 20 underlining language to be added. She also requested the <br /> 21 draft contain the date of revision. Mr. Ulrich stated staff <br /> 22 will do this on future drafts. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Mr. Ulrich reviewed the revision regarding assessment of <br /> 25 double frontage lots in that the long side would be assessed <br /> 26 25% of the adjusted front footage. This is proposed to be <br /> 27 reduced from 35% at the determination of the council. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Mr. Ulrich noted staff was requested to estimate the amount of <br /> 30 funds available for pavement maintenance activities like <br /> 31 sealcoating, crack sealing and patching. In the past, the <br /> 32 sealcoating projects cost about $50, 000 and patching was <br /> 33 contracted out at a cost of $50-60, 000. He estimated crack <br /> 34 sealing work cost about $10, 000. Mr. Ulrich reported the City <br /> 35 is now doing their own patching at a lower rate. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 With regard to cost impact, Mr. Ulrich advised if sealcoating <br /> 38 activity is omitted from the Assessment Policy and funded <br /> 39 through general tax revenue, it would cost the average house <br /> 40 ($85,900) an additional $19.71. He advised after further <br /> 41 research on the number of public hearing notices and <br /> 42 associated costs, staff recommends that this route be taken. <br /> 43 It was noted sealcoating benefits the Pavement Management <br /> 44 Program by prolonging the surface of the roadway. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 Mr. Ulrich informed the majority of City streets are in the <br /> 47 same condition and need sealcoating every five to seven years. <br /> 48 He asserted the actual cost to the resident in assessing the <br /> 49 single family homes for sealcoating versus paying via the <br /> 50 general tax levy, is about the same. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.