Laserfiche WebLink
Page 7 <br /> September 11, 1995 <br /> 1 experiences problems with it being open 24 hours, he is not going to keep it open because he does not <br /> 2 want to have neighbors mad at him or find vandalism or anything like that. However, two of his other <br /> 3 facilities are located within close range to residential areas and he has not experienced any problems <br /> 4 with those. His idea is to be a good neighbor. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Ms. Trude stated as she understood the primary factor was having an attendant on duty all the time. <br /> 7 He did not feel he could break even if he had to have someone there all the time. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Mr. Harstad stated a self-service car wash will probably generate 10% of the traffic that Fina next door <br /> 10 will. For the number of cars that go through his wash, it is difficult to justify having an attendant on <br /> 11 duty the whole time. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Dennis Richardson, representing his parents, stated he is a real estate appraiser and he can understand <br /> 14 the concerns stated,however he can guarantee that there will not be detriment to the value based on the <br /> 15 operations. The fact that the properties are located next to a commercial zone may have some impact <br /> 16 on the desirability of the property. He noted that when the presentation was originally made eight <br /> 17 years ago the hours of operation were jointly discussed and they wanted to have an attendant at the <br /> 18 property at all times because of the concerns that everyone has. However, the other car wash next <br /> 19 door and the full service dealer next to them have impacted them and the economics of the car wash <br /> 20 haven't been such that it could support this type of operation. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Mayor Linke closed the Public Hearing. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Blanchard to Approve Resolution No. 4809 Regarding the Conditional <br /> 25 Use Permit for Glen Harstad. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 VOTE: 3 ayes 2 nay (Quick/Hankner) Motion Fails <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Ms. Trude asked if she could reintroduce this Resolution 4809, striking Condition#1 and re-numbering <br /> 30 the other conditions. Mayor Linke noted that Condition#2 must be removed as well. The other <br /> 31 issues of the neighbors would be taken care of. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 MOTION/SECOND: Trude/Blanchard to approve Resolution 4814 striking Condition#1 and#2 as <br /> 34 outlined in Resolution 4809, and re-numbering the others accordingly. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Ms. Hankner asked how the passing the resolution would make the conditions different from what they <br /> 37 currently are. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Mayor Linke stated one item that differs is that the attendant does not have to be there all hours of <br /> 40 operation. It also requires plantings. It also dictates as 12-month review of the amendment. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 VOTE: 3 ayes 2 nays (Quick/Hankner) Motion Fails <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Ms. Trude asked how else the council's concerns could be addressed because at this time the Planning <br /> 45 Commission feels that this facility needs to change hands and there is not any willing buyer except for <br /> 46 one that would like to have some flexibility on the major expenses. The attendant is a major expense <br /> 47 for that operation. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Ms. Hankner stated she voted against this new Resolution as she was interested in how the residents <br /> 50 felt about the attendant issue. <br /> 51 <br />