My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1995/12/04
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
Agenda Packets - 1995/12/04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:27 PM
Creation date
7/2/2018 10:33:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/4/1995
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/4/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• While there may be some value in a uniform ordinance drawn up at the Commission level <br /> this is the province of individual cites, one of which indicted they were looking at their <br /> ordinance already. <br /> Roads <br /> Roads were listed number one across the board from among the list of 21 factors queried <br /> regarding firm's location decision making process. This represents general evidence of the need <br /> for completion of T. H. 610 and other road infrastructure projects serving the region. <br /> Working Group Question and Comments <br /> Should the completion of T. H 610 be set as one of the Commission's economic development <br /> goals? <br /> • Most felt it should be a high Commission priority, one felt it was already something <br /> North Metro Mayors was doing and should not be duplicated by the Commission. <br /> Taxes <br /> A number of topics such as property taxes, income and sales taxes, unemployment insurance and <br /> worker's compensation were also highly rated as location factors by local firms. The policies <br /> behind these factors are primarily formed at the state legislative level. <br /> Working Group Question and Comments <br /> Should the Commission play an active role on behalf of area firms lobbying for legislative <br /> attention to these issues? Should the Commission merely relay information gained in the <br /> survey to legislators for their information or should the Commission strive to stay out of the <br /> fray totally? <br /> • In general the Working Group felt it appropriate to share all the data with legislative <br /> leaders, but split on how actively it would be appropriate to advocate on behalf of <br /> businesses over these issues at the legislature. <br /> Other Important Factors <br /> A number of other assets were listed as important by smaller numbers of firms. <br /> Working Group Question and Comments <br /> Which of the following should be dealt with by each city alone, by the Commission, by both <br /> or does not merit attention at this time. <br /> 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.