Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Agenda Section: 15. <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Number: 95-1236WS <br /> AGENDA SESSION DATE February 6, 1995 Report Date: 2-2-95 <br /> DISPOSITION <br /> Item Description: Review Proposal for Soil Testing at Woodcrest Park <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> - No comments to supplement this report r ` *of c <br /> - Comments attached. \ <br /> Explanation/Summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> SUMMARY; <br /> Parks and Recreation Commissioners have set a goal of pursuing <br /> improvements to Woodcrest Park as was suggested by the neighborhood <br /> group of the SW section of the City and residents neighboring Woodcrest <br /> Park. Woodcrest Park is a very difficult park to improve because of its <br /> high water table, moving soils, and storm water ditch surrounding the <br /> park. The Commission intends on inviting the neighboring residents to a <br /> meeting for input as to their desires for the park. However, the <br /> Commission feels the need to know what is feasibly possible at Woodcrest <br /> Park, considering it's limitations. Therefore, the Commission has <br /> requested staff to pursue testing of the park to determine a <br /> professional opinion as to the needs of the park for further development <br /> and the estimated cost of such soil improvements. <br /> I have received a proposal from American Engineering Testing, Inc. and <br /> am expecting a proposal from SEH (not received yet, but will provide at <br /> or before the meeting) . Both would provide excellent services, with the <br /> price being the deciding factor. The proposal cost offered by American <br /> Engineering Services is estimated at $1700 - 1900. The service fee <br /> would be funded with Park Improvement monies from Park Dedication fees. <br /> • <br /> Diary S-ario, i rector of Parks, Recreation and Forestry <br /> RECOMMENDATION; <br /> Request the City Council to approve the geotechnical testing of <br /> Woodcrest Park for evaluation on the needs and costs of park <br /> improvements. <br />