Laserfiche WebLink
COTT OF <br />110,06 <br />� <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION <br />STAFF REPORT <br />- AGENDA SESSION DATE June 5, 1995 <br />Agenda Section: 9. <br />Report Number: 9 5- 1 '3 h 5 W S <br />Report Date: - - g �, <br />DISPOSITION <br />Item Description: Continued Discussion of the Water Meter Changeout Proposal <br />Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br />- No comments to supplement this report <br />- Comments attached. <br />Explanation/Summary (attach supplement s ets as , cessary.) <br />,SUMMARY; <br />After realizing at the May council work session, that a total residential <br />meter changeout would not be a lucrative as earlier reports had proposed, <br />Council directed staff to conduct testing of larger meters, and consider <br />alternative financing of this project. Staff, accompanied by consultants <br />from Waterpro and Sensus, have continued to test water meters within the <br />City. As was anticipated, the larger meters, which account for more revenue <br />lost or earned, were less accurate than the residential meters. The worst <br />two (2) inch meter was approximately eighty (80) percent accurate overall. <br />Most meters had relatively poor accuracy at low to medium flow, which <br />accounts for the majority of water consumed. Barring a very lengthy and <br />detailed staff report, I will summarize staff's findings and <br />recommendations. <br />If the City were to changeout the entire City, revenues would increase <br />approximately $25,000 in the first year. The City would now have created <br />a new benchmark for water earnings and meter accuracy (100 0). While our <br />cash intake would increase from past years, it would remain somewhat <br />constant after the first year. And while this increase is not enough <br />revenue to pay off the system changeout in ten (10) or fifteen (15) years, <br />it is additional revenue that is due the City. Sensus has prepared a <br />forecasted revenue report for the next twenty (20) years, anticipating a <br />four (4) percent increase for operational expense. It is anticipated that <br />the City would continue to loose accuracy in it's existing meters, thereby <br />loosing revenue. <br />The current system of reading meters has been somewhat adequate for the <br />City in the past. The City assumes that it's residents read the water <br />meters accurately and are responsible to pay for the amount of service they <br />receive. Once a year we have hired part time readers to verify the earlier <br />readings and inspect the meter to ensure it's integrity. This procedure is <br />becoming increasingly difficult to maintain. In light of the reported <br />violence throughout the nation, readers and residents are somewhat <br />reluctant to enter and allow entrance to their homes by a stranger. <br />Numerous meter readers have commented that they cannot gain access to the <br />meters, because residents will not let them in the house, or fail to <br />respond to prescheduled appointments. The initiation of an Automatic Meter <br />Readingg (AMR) system would solve these situations. <br />RECOMMENDATION; <br />