My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2010/04/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Agenda Packets - 2010/04/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:37 PM
Creation date
7/3/2018 11:30:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/26/2010
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/26/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 22, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> <br />Minnesota for the 2010 Municipal Well No. 1 and 2 Rehabilitation Project. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned why the wells needed to be rehabilitated. Public Works Director 3 <br />DeBar explained the wells supplied raw ground water that would then be treated by the City. 4 <br />Over time, the wells need to be rehabilitated from pumping 529 million gallons a year. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Council Member Mueller thanked staff for drafting the plans and specs in house. She questioned 7 <br />how much money the City saved by not sending this work to a consultant. Public Works 8 <br />Director DeBar stated he was working to create a standard bid proposal that would be used for all 9 <br />future projects, which took staff several days to complete. He noted input was provided from the 10 <br />City Attorney as well. The estimated savings was $5,000-10,000. 11 <br /> 12 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7593, 13 <br />Awarding a Construction Contract for the 2010 Municipal Well No. 1 and 2 Rehabilitation 14 <br />Project not to exceed $82,965. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Council Member Stigney questioned the $82,965 amount in the resolution. Public Works 17 <br />Director DeBar stated this amount would allow for a 5% contingency. He added that the expense 18 <br />may come in less if the line shafts are not needed. 19 <br /> 20 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 21 <br /> 22 <br />D. Resolution 7595, Awarding a Construction Contract for the Street and 23 <br />Utility Improvement Project - Area B/C. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Public Works Director DeBar reviewed the background information for the Street and Utility 26 <br />Program and the Area B/C project, which had been presented to the Council previously at the 27 <br />February 8, 2010 meeting. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Public Works Director DeBar presented the 13 bids received that ranged from $2,961,311.05 to 30 <br />$3,797,843.50 with the low bid submitted by Northwest Asphalt, Inc. of Shakopee, Minnesota. It 31 <br />was noted the engineer’s estimate was $3,400,000. He advised that Bonestroo and staff have 32 <br />previously worked with Northwest Asphalt and recommend awarding the contract to Northwest 33 <br />Asphalt. Construction is anticipated to begin in late April or early May 2010. Staff has spoken 34 <br />with Bonestroo regarding the scope of services needed for the Area B/C project. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Council Member Mueller asked staff to define Area B and Area C for those attending the 37 <br />meeting this evening. Public Works Director DeBar explained Area B and C were both bordered 38 <br />on the south by County Road H and to the north by County Road H2. Area B would run west of 39 <br />Silver Lake Road over to the Fridley/Spring Lake Park border. Area C would run East of Long 40 <br />Lake Road over to County Road 10, not including Wooddale Drive. He noted a neighborhood 41 <br />meeting was scheduled for April 13, 2010, at City Hall from 6:00-8:30 p.m. with a presentation 42 <br />made by the Consulting Engineer Joe Rhein. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned what the engineering expense would be for this project. Consulting 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.