My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2010/04/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Agenda Packets - 2010/04/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:37 PM
Creation date
7/3/2018 11:30:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/26/2010
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/26/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 22, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />amendment through regarding City projects that require special assessments. He reported he 1 <br />would bring further information to the Council once it is available. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Stigney questioned why the Charter was considering this change and requested 4 <br />further information from Staff. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Council Member Hull agreed and asked what the motive behind the changes is. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Member Mueller stated feasibility reports were quite expensive and she felt there were 9 <br />many other areas of the Charter that could be amended or reworked. She did not see the need for 10 <br />a change to the proposed section and suggested Staff forward a memorandum to the Charter 11 <br />Commission. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Council Member Gunn agreed with these comments and felt Staff’s memo should be sent to the 14 <br />Charter Commission. She questioned how future projects would proceed without numerous 15 <br />petitions and complaints. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Mayor Flaherty suggested a memorandum from Staff be delayed and instead a meeting be 18 <br />scheduled between the Council and the Charter Commission to gain insight on the motives and 19 <br />discuss the proposed amendments. 20 <br /> 21 <br />City Administrator Ericson indicated Coventry Senior Housing presented a proposed plan to the 22 <br />Planning Commission. The major concern at this time was traffic through the adjacent 23 <br />neighborhood. The developer would like to come before the City Council at the next Work 24 <br />Session meeting to gather feedback before submitting an official plan. 25 <br /> 26 <br />City Administrator Ericson noted the City has budgeted for him to attend three training 27 <br />conferences in 2010. Funds were set aside in the 2010 budget for each event. He questioned if 28 <br />the Council was still in favor of him attending all of these events. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Council Member Hull suggested the Clerk certification training be attended and the other two 31 <br />eliminated from the budget. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Council Member Mueller was in favor of City Administrator Ericson attending all three events. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Council Member Stigney suggested two out of the three events be attended and that City 36 <br />Administrator Ericson select the two that would be most valuable. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Council Member Gunn agreed with Council Member Stigney and noted the MCFOA conference 39 <br />must be attended. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mayor Flaherty felt the MCFOA conference was crucial and suggested that one of the other two 42 <br />events be selected. This would be another opportunity for savings to the community. 43 <br /> 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.