My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2010/06/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Agenda Packets - 2010/06/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:42 PM
Creation date
7/3/2018 11:45:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/28/2010
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/28/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 24, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />City. 1 <br /> 2 <br />Council Member Gunn supported the signs and suggested they be placed in key locations along 3 <br />County Road 10 and that they be removed the same afternoon as the farmer’s market. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Mueller was in favor of the signs and agreed to locate them along County Road 6 <br />10. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Council Member Stigney questioned the language within the Resolution regarding the temporary 9 <br />signs. He supported it as written and that no temporary signs be allowed throughout the City. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Council Member Hull felt the Resolution could be reworded to allow for the temporary signs to 12 <br />be located in the City on Saturdays. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Mayor Flaherty supported the temporary signs being placed in the City during the hours of 15 <br />operation of the farmer’s market. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson stated the code enforcement of this issue could be difficult. He 18 <br />suggested the Council not allow additional signs on the corridor as it may bring about additional 19 <br />code enforcement concerns. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Mayor Flaherty thanked staff for the information and stated he would now not support the 22 <br />temporary signs. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Planning Associate Heller suggested the “6 small sign” language be stricken from the Resolution. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Ms. Basumatary stated she didn’t see how the signs would impact the corridor if she were 27 <br />responsible for the placement and removal of the signs. She requested the Council consider 28 <br />allowing the temporary signs to assist in getting the word out on the new farmer’s market. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson recommended the language regarding the two large signs read that 31 <br />the signs “only be allowed on the day of the market”. The Council supported this 32 <br />recommendation. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Community Development Director Roberts suggested language be added stating: “All signs shall 35 <br />be removed after each sales day”. Although a bit redundant, it would provide further 36 <br />clarification. The Council supported this recommendation. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned if the City should limit the number of vendors within the Resolution. 39 <br />Council Member Gunn felt this was not a concern as the theater parking lot was extremely large 40 <br />and available on Saturday mornings. Council Member Mueller agreed. Planning Associate 41 <br />Heller noted the theater had 700 parking stalls. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Council Member Stigney suggested the two temporary signs be limited to 32 square feet to assure 44 <br />that the signs do not continue to increase in size. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.