Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 28, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />this further before renewing the liquor license. 1 <br /> 2 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Flaherty. To Reaffirm Resolution 7444, approving the 3 <br />Conditional Use Permit to Allow an Outside Sales Operation at 2400 County Road H2 for 4 <br />Roberts Sports Bar and that Mr. Halverson be required to pay the City $639.90 for unpaid 5 <br />Attorney’s fees by July 30, 2010. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Mayor Flaherty understood the need to have the expense paid and felt this was a CUP fee and 8 <br />should not be tied to the liquor license. However, if the fees were not paid in 30 days he would 9 <br />like to see the expense certified to the property taxes for payment in 2012. 10 <br /> 11 <br /> Ayes – 3 Nays – 1 (Hull) Motion carried. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Council Member Mueller requested Item F be moved up on the agenda for discussion as a 14 <br />resident was present for this Item. The Council was in favor with this suggestion. 15 <br /> 16 <br />F. Resolution 7637, Resolution of Denial for Second Driveway Access for 17 <br />Property at 2832 Woodcrest Drive. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Community Development Director Roberts explained Dick Comben was requesting City Council 20 <br />approve the retention of a second street access for the existing driveway at 2832 Woodcrest 21 <br />Drive. On June 10, 2010, Mr. Comben submitted an application to the Public Works Department 22 <br />for a second driveway access as part of the City’s private improvement plan (PIP). Staff 23 <br />reviewed the application and the site conditions and determined that the proposed second 24 <br />driveway access does not meet current city standards as the driveway was gravel and not in 25 <br />conformance with current City code. Staff was seeking additional input from Council regarding 26 <br />this issue, but recommended denying the request for two driveways. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Dick Comben, 2832 Woodcrest Drive, requested the Council consider the aesthetics of the 29 <br />current driveway as the home was designed around the rainbow-style driveway. Mr. Comben 30 <br />indicated the entry steps to the house were 16 feet wide again matching the style of the driveway. 31 <br />He explained the driveway had been in its current state for 30+ years. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Council Member Mueller thanked Mr. Comben for providing pictures to the Council as it 34 <br />assisted in providing a proper visual picture of the property. She pointed out that a tree was 35 <br />saved by the designing in the driveway and agreed the Class 5 driveway did match the rural feel 36 <br />of the property. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Council Member Hull questioned what the City’s policy was for single gravel driveways in the 39 <br />City. Community Development Director Roberts stated a single driveway could remain gravel, 40 <br />would receive a curb cut but the second access was the concern for this property. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if the Street Utility Committee discussed two curb cuts for a single 43 <br />driveway and were any standards established. Jim Battin, Chairman of the Street Utility 44 <br />Committee indicated this was discussed in 2008 and the Resolution passed by Council was based 45