My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2010/08/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Agenda Packets - 2010/08/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:29 PM
Creation date
7/3/2018 11:52:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/9/2010
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/9/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 28, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />this further before renewing the liquor license. 1 <br /> 2 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Flaherty. To Reaffirm Resolution 7444, approving the 3 <br />Conditional Use Permit to Allow an Outside Sales Operation at 2400 County Road H2 for 4 <br />Roberts Sports Bar and that Mr. Halverson be required to pay the City $639.90 for unpaid 5 <br />Attorney’s fees by July 30, 2010. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Mayor Flaherty understood the need to have the expense paid and felt this was a CUP fee and 8 <br />should not be tied to the liquor license. However, if the fees were not paid in 30 days he would 9 <br />like to see the expense certified to the property taxes for payment in 2012. 10 <br /> 11 <br /> Ayes – 3 Nays – 1 (Hull) Motion carried. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Council Member Mueller requested Item F be moved up on the agenda for discussion as a 14 <br />resident was present for this Item. The Council was in favor with this suggestion. 15 <br /> 16 <br />F. Resolution 7637, Resolution of Denial for Second Driveway Access for 17 <br />Property at 2832 Woodcrest Drive. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Community Development Director Roberts explained Dick Comben was requesting City Council 20 <br />approve the retention of a second street access for the existing driveway at 2832 Woodcrest 21 <br />Drive. On June 10, 2010, Mr. Comben submitted an application to the Public Works Department 22 <br />for a second driveway access as part of the City’s private improvement plan (PIP). Staff 23 <br />reviewed the application and the site conditions and determined that the proposed second 24 <br />driveway access does not meet current city standards as the driveway was gravel and not in 25 <br />conformance with current City code. Staff was seeking additional input from Council regarding 26 <br />this issue, but recommended denying the request for two driveways. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Dick Comben, 2832 Woodcrest Drive, requested the Council consider the aesthetics of the 29 <br />current driveway as the home was designed around the rainbow-style driveway. Mr. Comben 30 <br />indicated the entry steps to the house were 16 feet wide again matching the style of the driveway. 31 <br />He explained the driveway had been in its current state for 30+ years. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Council Member Mueller thanked Mr. Comben for providing pictures to the Council as it 34 <br />assisted in providing a proper visual picture of the property. She pointed out that a tree was 35 <br />saved by the designing in the driveway and agreed the Class 5 driveway did match the rural feel 36 <br />of the property. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Council Member Hull questioned what the City’s policy was for single gravel driveways in the 39 <br />City. Community Development Director Roberts stated a single driveway could remain gravel, 40 <br />would receive a curb cut but the second access was the concern for this property. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Council Member Gunn asked if the Street Utility Committee discussed two curb cuts for a single 43 <br />driveway and were any standards established. Jim Battin, Chairman of the Street Utility 44 <br />Committee indicated this was discussed in 2008 and the Resolution passed by Council was based 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.