Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 28, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />on the recommendations of the Committee. Mr. Battin stated the major consideration of double 1 <br />driveways was the cost for two curb cuts on a single lot. He felt the current property being 2 <br />discussed predated the current Ordinance. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Council Member Gunn questioned if the pictures provided to Council were recent. Mr. Comben 5 <br />indicated the pictures were taken this spring after the driveway was graded. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Council Member Gunn expressed concern about setting precedence with other double driveways 8 <br />in the City. She noted the Street Utility Committee created standards that should apply to the 9 <br />entire community. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Mayor Flaherty indicated the City was willing to take on each resident on a case-by-case basis 12 <br />and did not feel precedence would be set on this case. He explained the driveway has been in 13 <br />this position for over 30 years and was extremely well maintained. Mayor Flaherty noted the 14 <br />second curb cut would be at the homeowner’s expense and recommended allowing the second 15 <br />curb cut. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Council Member Mueller felt that because single access driveways were not required to be 18 <br />upgraded to be a paved surface, this property owner should not be required to be paved. She 19 <br />stated she would be in favor of a new Resolution approving the second driveway access for Mr. 20 <br />Comben. 21 <br /> 22 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. Directing Staff to revise Resolution 7637, to show approval 23 <br />of the owner’s requested Waiver or Variance to have two driveway accesses for the property at 24 <br />2832 Woodcrest Drive, acknowledging the homeowner will be responsible for the expense of the 25 <br />second curb cut. 26 <br /> 27 <br />City Administrator Ericson stated staff would revise Resolution 7637 to state approval of the 28 <br />variance request in the affirmative allowing the double driveway access. He indicated the 29 <br />Resolution would be rewritten and brought back to Council for approval on the Consent Agenda 30 <br />at the July 12th Council Meeting. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Hull thanked staff for the proper recommendation and all information provided 33 <br />regarding the variance request to Council. However, he felt the property should not be 34 <br />“punished” for recent Code changes. 35 <br /> 36 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 37 <br /> 38 <br />C. Continued Public Hearing, Resolution 7625, a Resolution to Consider an On 39 <br />Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for Robert’s Sports Bar and 40 <br />Entertainment located at 2400 County Road H2. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Assistant City Administrator Crane explained Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment did submit 43 <br />the city liquor license application after the June 14, 2010, City Council Meeting. Fees, 44 <br />Certificate of Liability Insurance and the background check application were received on Friday, 45