My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2010/08/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Agenda Packets - 2010/08/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:29 PM
Creation date
7/3/2018 11:52:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/9/2010
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/9/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 28, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />on the recommendations of the Committee. Mr. Battin stated the major consideration of double 1 <br />driveways was the cost for two curb cuts on a single lot. He felt the current property being 2 <br />discussed predated the current Ordinance. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Council Member Gunn questioned if the pictures provided to Council were recent. Mr. Comben 5 <br />indicated the pictures were taken this spring after the driveway was graded. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Council Member Gunn expressed concern about setting precedence with other double driveways 8 <br />in the City. She noted the Street Utility Committee created standards that should apply to the 9 <br />entire community. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Mayor Flaherty indicated the City was willing to take on each resident on a case-by-case basis 12 <br />and did not feel precedence would be set on this case. He explained the driveway has been in 13 <br />this position for over 30 years and was extremely well maintained. Mayor Flaherty noted the 14 <br />second curb cut would be at the homeowner’s expense and recommended allowing the second 15 <br />curb cut. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Council Member Mueller felt that because single access driveways were not required to be 18 <br />upgraded to be a paved surface, this property owner should not be required to be paved. She 19 <br />stated she would be in favor of a new Resolution approving the second driveway access for Mr. 20 <br />Comben. 21 <br /> 22 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. Directing Staff to revise Resolution 7637, to show approval 23 <br />of the owner’s requested Waiver or Variance to have two driveway accesses for the property at 24 <br />2832 Woodcrest Drive, acknowledging the homeowner will be responsible for the expense of the 25 <br />second curb cut. 26 <br /> 27 <br />City Administrator Ericson stated staff would revise Resolution 7637 to state approval of the 28 <br />variance request in the affirmative allowing the double driveway access. He indicated the 29 <br />Resolution would be rewritten and brought back to Council for approval on the Consent Agenda 30 <br />at the July 12th Council Meeting. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Hull thanked staff for the proper recommendation and all information provided 33 <br />regarding the variance request to Council. However, he felt the property should not be 34 <br />“punished” for recent Code changes. 35 <br /> 36 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 37 <br /> 38 <br />C. Continued Public Hearing, Resolution 7625, a Resolution to Consider an On 39 <br />Sale Intoxicating Liquor License Renewal for Robert’s Sports Bar and 40 <br />Entertainment located at 2400 County Road H2. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Assistant City Administrator Crane explained Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment did submit 43 <br />the city liquor license application after the June 14, 2010, City Council Meeting. Fees, 44 <br />Certificate of Liability Insurance and the background check application were received on Friday, 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.