My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2010/08/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Agenda Packets - 2010/08/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:29 PM
Creation date
7/3/2018 11:52:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/9/2010
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/9/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 28, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br /> <br />June 18, 2010. Staff checked with Ramsey County Property Tax Records, and this property is 1 <br />up to date on property tax payments. The Mounds View Police Department has issued a 2 <br />satisfactory report for Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment. The City’s Fire Marshal has 3 <br />issued an unsatisfactory report for Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment. No changes were 4 <br />made to bring the site into compliance. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Assistant City Administrator Crane indicated the Finance Department issued an unsatisfactory 7 <br />report. Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment owes the City $1,610.69 for a past due utility bill 8 <br />and another totaling $639.00 for attorney fees associated with the Conditional Use Permit for 9 <br />outdoor sales. Staff has sent four certified letters to Robert’s Sports Bar regarding these 10 <br />concerns. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Assistant City Administrator Crane contacted Robert’s Sports Bar and Entertainment (Floyd 13 <br />Halverson) on June 22, 2010 to inform the establishment of this delinquency. Staff was 14 <br />informed by Mr. Floyd Halverson that the license holder (Kevin Halverson), is aware of what is 15 <br />owed, and that the City should “…take it up with the owner. That is between the City and Kevin 16 <br />Halverson.” Staff further informed Mr. Floyd Halverson that this delinquency will have to be 17 <br />reported to the City Council and this delinquency may jeopardize their liquor license renewal. 18 <br />The Halverson’s were aware of the public hearing scheduled for this renewal, nut were out of 19 <br />town. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Staff explained the City Council could either not renew the liquor license due to the delinquency 22 <br />and failed fire inspection or renew the license contingent on full payment of utility bill, attorney 23 <br />fees, and a satisfactory fire inspection by a deadline set by the City Council. If delinquencies are 24 <br />not paid, and no corrections have been made since the last fire inspection by the deadline date, 25 <br />then the City Council could choose to suspend or revoke the liquor license at a later City Council 26 <br />Meeting. If the City Council wishes to approve the liquor license renewal, then the license 27 <br />period would be from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011. It was noted the current license would lapse 28 <br />on June 30, 2010. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Mayor Flaherty reopened the public hearing at 8:55 p.m. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Hearing no public input, Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing at 8:55 p.m. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Council Member Mueller expressed concern about the lapse in fire monitoring services at 35 <br />Robert’s. She indicated the unsatisfactory fire re-inspection was also a great concern. Council 36 <br />Member Mueller felt she could agree to a payment plan for the utility fees, but did not know if 37 <br />the failed fire inspection could be overlooked. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Council Member Hull questioned what would happen if a fire head were to go off at Robert’s 40 <br />with out the monitoring company support. Community Development Director Roberts indicated 41 <br />this would delay fire calls to the site. He indicated the establishment was required by City code 42 <br />to have a fire monitoring contract for the site. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Council Member Hull expressed great distress due to the fact the applicant was not present at the 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.