Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution 7501 Adopting Non-Standard Street Design Configuration for Edgewood Drive <br />September 28, 2009 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />The following cost estimates are determined for the following options as shown on the notice: <br /> <br />Option <br />Cost Amount <br />South of Woodale <br />Cost Amount <br />North of Woodale <br />Total Cost <br />Amount <br />Option 1: 2-12-12-8=34’ wide w/ 11’ multi-use trail $ 367,500 $ 367,500 $ 735,000 <br />Option 2: 5.5-12-12-8=37.5’ wide w/ 6.5’ sidewalk $ 399,600 $ 399,600 $ 799,200 <br />Option 3: 8-12-12-8=40’ wide w/ 6.5’ sidewalk $ 410,800 $ 410,800 $ 821,600 <br /> <br />Committee Recommendation <br />The Streets and Utilities Committee is recommending that the City Council adopt Option 3 for <br />the Edgewood Drive design configuration (vote tally was 5 for - 2 against). This option is most <br />similar to existing conditions (parking lanes on both sides of travel lanes) but includes a 6.5 foot <br />off-street (behind the curb) concrete sidewalk the entire length of Edgewood Drive from County <br />Road H to H2. The two members voting against this recommendation did not want full-parking <br />north of Woodale, but felt it was warranted south of Woodale. A revised design option of having <br />5.5 foot bicycles lanes in lieu of the parking lanes north of Woodale was suggested by one <br />member. The need for off-street pedestrian accommodations was unanimous with the <br />Committee. <br /> <br />Other items discussed included bump-outs, crosswalks, turn lanes, and parking limitations. <br />Bump-outs could be considered at the main crossing for the school (between the sidewalk <br />easement and school visitor parking), Woodale Drive, and Clearview Avenue for traffic calming <br />and pedestrian friendly roadway crossing. The Committee also recommended that the <br />crosswalks in front of the school and across County Road H and H2 be improved for safety <br />reasons. City staff will be discussing the County Road crossings with Ramsey County in the <br />near future. Turn lanes were also suggested for southbound traffic at County Road H and <br />northbound traffic at County Road H2. Lastly, if parking lanes are built into the roadway <br />configuration, then City staff recommends no limitations for parking in the corridor (complying <br />with Municipal Code). City staff will also be coordinating ideas for student drop-off/pick-up with <br />school staff for safety reasons. <br /> <br />City staff was informed by Bonestroo that if Option 3 is adopted by the City Council, the 60 foot <br />right-of-way would not be wide enough to accommodate infiltration features. However, <br />Bonestroo thinks that there is enough infiltration between excess infiltration area in Area A and <br />planned infiltration area in Area B/C to meet the Rice Creek Watershed District requirements. <br />Alternatively, additional locations could be pursued, including property owned by the school <br />near the tennis courts. This would be the only suitable location in the Edgewood Drive right-of- <br />way south of Woodale due to the steepness of the roadway. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution 7501 which will adopt Option 3 for <br />the general design configuration for reconstructing Edgewood Drive. Although any of the <br />presented options would be suitable, our recommendation for Option 3 is based upon meeting <br />the needs of Edgewood MS and the concerns of homeowners on Edgewood Drive wanted an <br />“as-is” condition. Although Staff does not believe that parking on the west side north of <br />Woodale is needed, Option 3 provides a compromise for all stakeholders involved with this <br />process. <br /> <br />