My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2009/09/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Agenda Packets - 2009/09/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:15 PM
Creation date
7/4/2018 11:27:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/28/2009
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/28/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution 7501 Adopting Non-Standard Street Design Configuration for Edgewood Drive <br />September 28, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />foot bituminous trail. The multi-use trail is also a missing link between the multi-use trails <br />located along County Roads H and H2. <br /> <br />Option 2 provided two 12 foot drive lanes, one 8 foot dual-use parking/bike lane on the east, <br />and 5.5 foot, on-street bike lane on the west for SB traffic (total width of 38 feet face-to-face of <br />curb). This option provides 100% off-street pedestrian accommodations but all bicycle <br />accommodations are on-street. <br /> <br />Lengthy discussions were had during the June 2, 2009 public information meeting while <br />Edgewood Drive options were presented. A group of property owners in Area C wanted to see <br />Edgewood Drive remain the same configuration as it currently exists. Traffic, safety, pedestrian <br />movements, parking, pavement conditions, and other items were discussed during the <br />presentation. Edgewood Drive options presented at the June 2, 2009 public information <br />meeting included the following: <br />• Option 1: 34 foot total width (f-f curb) with multi-use trail (9/26=35%); <br />• Option 2: 38 foot total width (f-f curb) with off-street sidewalk and on-street bike lane <br />(5/26=19%); <br />• Option 3: No opinion (2/26=8%); <br />• Write-in (10/26=38%). <br /> <br />Nine of the ten write-in comments were in favor of reconstructing Edgewood Drive to the same <br />configuration that currently exists. No representatives from Edgewood Middle School staff were <br />present nor any students or parents that identified themselves as such. Staff met with <br />Edgewood Middle School staff and the school resource officer (SRO) on April 15, 2009 to <br />review the proposed options. School staff and the SRO felt that Option 1 would best serve the <br />needs and functions of the students and school activities. <br /> <br />Option 3 was developed as a result of the June 2, 2009 public information meeting and <br />feedback requesting an “as-is” configuration. Option 3 provides parking lanes on both sides of <br />the street but reduces each lane by 2 feet and the overall street width by 5 feet in accordance <br />with MSAS standards. A 6.5 foot off-street, concrete sidewalk was also added to the east side <br />of the roadway to address pedestrian needs with Edgewood Middle School. This option was <br />first introduced at the June 15, 2009 Committee meeting. <br /> <br />A recommendation by the Committee for Edgewood Drive was delayed at their August meeting <br />to allow Committee members to witness traffic and congestion associated with Edgewood <br />Middle School. Notices were mailed to Area C residents informing them of the Committee’s <br />intent to make a recommendation at their September 21, 2009 meeting in which approximately <br />20 persons were in attendance, including the Edgewood MS Principal and School Resource <br />Officer (SRO). The MS Principal and SRO were in favor of Option 1. <br /> <br />Option Costs <br />Costs associated with the Edgewood Drive amenities were also discussed at the September <br />meeting and are attached to this report. This summary is broken into amenity type and segment <br />(north and south of Woodale Drive - same distance). A base cost was established as the City <br />recommended standard street width of 28-feet. The costs associated with the addition of on- <br />street amenities reflect designation of 12-foot drive lanes and applicable clear zones. For <br />instance, if an 8-foot parking lane is added to the 28-foot wide base cost, the total street width <br />(face-to-face of curb) will be 34-feet (2’+12’+12’+8’) and not 36-feet (28’+8’). If a 5.5-foot bike <br />lane is added to this, the cost will be for a total street width of 37.5-feet (5.5’+12’+12’+8’) and <br />not 41.5-feet (5.5’+28’+8’). Costs for off-street amenities are associated with locating these <br />amenities directly behind the top back of curb.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.