My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2008/11/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
Agenda Packets - 2008/11/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:02 PM
Creation date
7/5/2018 11:03:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/8/2008
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/8/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 8, 2008 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br />Due to the confusion on allowable residents, the motioner and the seconder the reference to 1 <br />parent in the language. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Council Member Stigney said that Section 1G states that it must have at least 60% of the units 4 <br />for any of the types. He then said that he would like to have it broken down as to what 5 <br />percentage is required for each type of housing. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Council Member Stigney said that he would like to consider leaving the property requirements at 8 <br />three acres. He then said that the standard should be set at what the City wants so that it is 9 <br />adequate for parking. He then said that he cannot support the ordinance as it is. 10 <br /> 11 <br />Council Member Hull asked what other cities do for parking. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Planner Heller indicated that the parking standards came from other cities. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Council Member Stigney asked how many parking spaces it provides and, despite what other 16 <br />cities do, parking for the previously discussed senior development is inadequate in his opinion. 17 <br />He then said that he would like to include parking for residents and visitors as well as staff. 18 <br /> 19 <br /> Ayes – 3 Nays – 2(Stigney/Flaherty) Motion carried. 20 <br /> 21 <br /> C. Resolution 7329 Authorizing Certification of the Proposed General Fund 22 <br /> Budget and Property Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2009. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Finance Director Beer presented the preliminary property tax levy and budget for 2009 to the 25 <br />Council for consideration. The total levy including debt service for the 2004 street projects will 26 <br />decrease by about $39,000. The total amount is $6,064,000 and staff recommends approval. 27 <br /> 28 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Marty. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 7329, 29 <br />Authorizing Certification of the Proposed General Fund Budget and Property Tax Levy for Fiscal 30 <br />Year 2009. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that Council would need to reduce the budget by $39,000 to 33 <br />account for the previously approved decrease in franchise fees. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Council Member Hull asked whether the City is in danger of one year with a huge increase to 36 <br />account for the fact that 2009 would be the fourth year in a row with no increase. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Finance Director Beer indicated that it is possible that could happen, however, the big increase in 39 <br />local government aid made it not necessary to increase this year. He then said that, if the local 40 <br />government aid were taken away, that would have an impact on the budget. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Council Member Flaherty said that his theory is that Council set the levy reduction fund with the 43 <br />idea that TIF districts will begin coming on the tax rolls in 2014. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.