My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2008/11/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
Agenda Packets - 2008/11/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:02 PM
Creation date
7/5/2018 11:03:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
11/8/2008
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
11/8/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Stormwater Infiltration Program <br />Staff Response to Appeal <br />2009-2010 Street and Utility Improvement Project <br />Property Address:2600 Sherwood Road <br />Basis for Appeal:Multiple – Maintenance, Physical <br />Date of Appeal:October 29, 2008 <br />Date of Appeal Hearing:November 10, 2008 <br />Staff Recommendation:Denial <br />Basis for Staff Recommendation: <br />The property owner has not presented any objective supporting information for <br />their appeal. The argument presented by the property owner is based on personal <br />opinion, supposition, emotion, and a general opposition to the SIP. The standard <br />for upholding the appeal has not been met. <br />Discussion: <br />The property owner states eight numbered points in their written argument on the <br />appeal form. A response to each is stated below: <br />1.The property owner is stating their personal opposition to the SIP, their <br />opinion that this is unfair, and that they receive no benefit. The City must <br />incorporate water quality and volume controls as part of the project in order to <br />meet the requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. The locations <br />have been selected based on drainage characteristics and existing physical <br />obstacles. The locations provide the maximum and most effective benefit to <br />the overall City stormwater management system as a whole, while minimizing <br />impacts to the existing properties. Unfortunately, the goal of the SIP is not to <br />provide direct benefit to individual properties. <br />2.The property owner contracts their yard maintenance, therefore there is no <br />hardship due to their age or physical abilities. The infiltration feature will be <br />readily maintainable by the contract service. The maximum drawdown time <br />for the feature is 48-hours. Therefore, while there may be a short period of <br />time immediately following a rain event where water is standing in the swale, <br />it should be reasonable for the maintenance service to plan their work <br />accordingly and continue regular maintenance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.