Laserfiche WebLink
MAR-31-1994 14:58 <br />RC SOLID WASTE 612 633 0571 P.06 <br />3. The yard waste site in Ardan Park should... <br />No. <br />Be closed 2.1 <br />Be moved 13 4.6 <br />Stay where it is 252 89.4 <br />Comments were written in for this question, too: <br />No. Description <br />2 move the site closer to Arden Hills or <br />Shoreview <br />1 lower property value due to traffic and smell <br />1 lawn care -services-are -dumping large- --- <br />quantities, and should be charged a fee <br />1 is bagless, curbside pick-up possible? <br />1 stop the project, monetary concerns <br />1 don't want it too close <br />1 it would be difficult to dispose of yard waste <br />4. One way to limit traffic and yard waste volumes is to limit use to <br />County residents. If Ramsey County started asking for <br />identification (driver's license) at the site to limit use to <br />County residents, I would: <br />No. <br />Object --37T <br />Not object 261 92.6 <br />Comments on this question were as follows: <br />No. Description <br />2 object to non -County people using the site <br />4 use non -paid volunteer; operating cost concern <br />1 do not put obstacles in way of reducing waste stream <br />1 does not make sense <br />5. If the site were relocated to an area near the new golf course, I <br />would use it: <br />No. <br />More � . 1 <br />Less 42 14.9 <br />The same 203 72.0 <br />Not at all 20 7.1 <br />TOTAL P.06 <br />