Laserfiche WebLink
MAR-31-1994 14:58 RC SOLID WASTE 612 633 0571 P.06 <br /> 3. The yard waste site in Ardan Park should. . . <br /> No. <br /> Be closed 2. 1 <br /> Be moved 13 4 .6 <br /> Stay where it is 252 89.4 <br /> Comments were written in for this question, too: <br /> No. Description <br /> 2 move the site closer to Arden Hills or <br /> Shoreview <br /> 1 lower property value due to traffic and smell <br /> 1 lawn care-services -are-dumping large <br /> quantities, and should be charged a fee <br /> 1 is bagless, curbside pick-up possible? <br /> 1 stop the project, monetary concerns <br /> 1 don't want it too close <br /> 1 it would be difficult to dispose of yard waste <br /> 4. One way to limit traffic and yard waste volumes is to limit use to <br /> County residents. If Ramsey County started asking for <br /> identification (driver's license) at the site to limit use to <br /> County residents, I would: <br /> No. <br /> Object 1U11 --77T <br /> Not object 261 92.6 <br /> Comments on this question were as follows: <br /> No. Description <br /> 2 object to non-County people using the site <br /> 4 use non-paid volunteer; operating cost concern <br /> 1 do not put obstacles in way of reducing waste stream <br /> 1 does not make sense <br /> 5. If the site were relocated to an area near the new golf course, I <br /> would use it: <br /> No. <br /> More . 1 <br /> Less 42 14 .9 <br /> The same 203 72 .0 <br /> Not at all 20 7 . 1 <br /> • <br /> TOTAL P.06 <br />