Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br /> JULY 1, 1993 <br /> PAGE FOUR <br /> is hiding under her car, or demands that the City do something <br /> about the neighbor down the street whose house is painted a <br /> different color than the garage, or screams into the phone <br /> because the City hasn't mowed the weeds in the park for over <br /> a month the list is endless. <br /> The bottom line is: <br /> the taxpayer does not want to pay any more taxes, but they do <br /> want the same or better level of service. It all translates into <br /> the fact that the taxpayer wants quality service in a timely <br /> manner ata cost that is commensurate with the level- of service. <br /> The City must decide that any tax increase, be it user fee based <br /> or property, must give the taxpayer something of value that <br /> he/she can measure. <br /> * The old saying, "if it's not broke, don't fix it" no longer has <br /> applicability in this day and age. The saying now is: "if it's <br /> not broke, there is still time to make sure it doesn't break" . <br /> The City must make decisions that will be sound decisions for <br /> now and will be just as sound in 5-10 years. We can no longer <br /> afford to be "reactive" , we must formulate and implement policies <br /> that are "proactive" . <br /> * If the City is desirous of initiating new service programs, the <br /> payback must be visible and measurable and the City must be <br /> willing to "bit the tax bullet" to make it happen or make <br /> reductions in current programs and also incorporate <br /> accountability into the process. People will pay for what they <br /> can see will benefit them as individuals. <br /> Decisions will have to be made regarding the housing rehab <br /> program and redevelopment program that will prove to be <br /> both beneficial to the City as a collective entity and the <br /> individual taxpayer. <br /> The overall scenario for the future is one that is clouded by <br /> uncertainty and measured by instruments that may no longer <br /> accurately reflect the true status of municipal government. While <br /> we may seek to "re-invent" government as a means of taping the as <br /> yet untapped resources and undiscovered methods of operations, we <br /> still must remain focused on our one true mission: Provide the best <br /> service at the best possible cost now and into the future. If we <br /> fail that most industrious mission, we fail it all. Current and <br /> future actions should be based on an eye to the future. If not, the <br /> Council and staff of 2003 may be looking back at us with none too <br /> pleasant things to say and one of those comments will be: <br /> "Why didn't they plan for what they knew was going to happen?" <br />