Laserfiche WebLink
of compaction could require specialized equipment such as road <br /> graders or tandem trucks with underbody blades. These would have <br /> to be rented or contracted and would increase costs. Greater <br /> quantities of salt and sand would be required to cut through the <br /> snow pack; and salt is ineffective at lower temperatures. Again <br /> this would increase costs. Finally, the wear and tear on equip- <br /> ment is much greater when plowing heavier snows and/or in condi- <br /> tions of compaction. We have, at times, had to plow under these <br /> conditions and we have had additional repair expenses. <br /> The main benefit identified for waiting for heavier snowfalls is <br /> supposed cost savings. The major cost savings would be in a storm <br /> that lasted only long enough that beginning after 3 or 4 inches <br /> of snowfall, the entire city would be completed without overtime <br /> costs. This may not be the case since heavier snows may require <br /> plowing at lower speeds, therefore negating any time savings. The <br /> detriments listed above also indicate that any savings anticipat- <br /> ed may not actually materialize. <br /> The second issue of concern is that of replacing mail boxes. Our <br /> policy is to replace mail boxes that are physically struck by a <br /> plow blade or other piece of equipment. If snow rolling off the <br /> blade damages the mail box, then the City does not participate in <br /> the repair of the mail box. If the cause of the damage is disput- <br /> ed, the Clerk-Administrator determines the issue with appeals <br /> handled by Council. Most other cities have similar policies. <br /> There have been some residents that feel the mail box should be <br /> replaced by the City in any case that snow plowing operations are <br /> the cause of the damage. This would include old posts that are <br /> rotten and can no longer support the mail box when snow is blown <br /> onto it, or possibly improperly installed mail boxes that are too <br /> close to the road or are too low. In discussing this issue with <br /> our operators, it became apparent that in many instances resi- <br /> dents do not contact the City and make repairs themselves, and in <br /> other instances have asked for repairs when other vehicles have <br /> caused the damage. <br /> While we have not kept records of mail boxes damaged by snow <br /> rolling off plow blades, the staff believes there are probably 2 <br /> to 3 dozen instances each year. In a bad year maybe 50 mail boxes <br /> are damaged. If the Council determines to accept responsibility <br /> for any snow plow operations damage, the cost would be approx- <br /> imately $25 per mail box plus labor for installation, or roughly <br /> up to $1, 250 per year and 25 to 30 hours of labor at $20 per <br /> hour. <br /> Another concern is the blocking of sidewalks and drives when <br /> private snow plow operators clear private property such as park- <br /> ing lots and driveways. Many of these operators plow snow over a <br /> sidewalk as they plow a parking lot or drive and do not return to <br /> clean the sidewalk which leaves a windrow of snow across the <br /> sidewalk. In some instances this can occur as snow is pushed past <br /> a driveway also. Often the plow operator plows snow out of a lot <br /> and across the street to leave the snow on the opposite side from <br /> where it originated. This can cause subsequent plowing problems <br /> and in some cases is the cause of blocked driveways. Our ordi- <br />