My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-22-2008 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
12-22-2008 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:47 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 12:02:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/22/2008
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
12/22/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />HAY Point Analysis and 2009 Pay Plan <br />December 22, 2008 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Second, having a pay plan with established pay ranges is easier to administer because it is <br />not dependent on conducting a market survey of all positions every year. Salaries of <br />benchmark positions can be monitored annually to make sure that the City’s pay plan is <br />consistent with its market position. On average, the City should expect to conduct a complete <br />salary survey and job evaluation study every five years or so. <br /> <br />Third, in establishing its pay plan, the City can consider its market position. The City can <br />establish a policy to be equal to market, to lead market, or to lag market. <br /> <br />On-going administration. The City should expect development of a pay plan based on grades <br />to result in efficient administration of its compensation program, primarily because the City <br />will not have to maintain separate pay scales for each position. Adopting such a pay plan <br />will also result in consistent administration of the City’s compensation program, regardless of <br />whether market data exists for a given position. <br /> <br /> <br />Implementation <br /> <br />Springsted recommends that the market and predicted wage increases be implemented over <br />time rather than all at once. The 2009 budget has already been adopted and the full extent <br />of the wage increases cannot be absorbed in one year without causing significant budgetary <br />consequences. Add to that the uncertainties caused by the State’s budget crisis, the <br />“phasing in” of the recommended increases over time is a fiscally conservative and sensible <br />approach. Staff recommends preparation of a multi-year pay plan that would incorporate a <br />maximum 3% wage increase in 2009 for those positions which, based on the attached <br />wages table, would warrant a market or predicated pay increase. <br /> <br />For positions that are observed to be paid in excess of the market or, absent reliable market <br />data, in excess of the predicted wage, the Council may consider adopting a lower cost of <br />living increase in subsequent years, however it would not be my recommendation to do so. <br />In addition to the potential detriment to morale, it would be likely that other cities would <br />eventually catch up with the Mounds View positions in the long term, negating the need for <br />reduced COLA increases. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of Resolution 7380, a resolution approving the results of the <br />Springsted salary compensation study and authorizes the preparation of the 2009 pay plan <br />effective January 1, 2009. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />Clerk-Administrator <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.