My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-01-2016 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
08-01-2016 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:18 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 12:22:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/1/2016
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/1/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Appearance as a second dwelling: The intent is for ADU’s to appear subordinate to the <br />Single-Family Home. Appearance is subjective, and will be determined by the Planning <br />Commission and City Council through the Public Hearing process, unless permitted as <br />an internal ADU. <br /> <br />Parking: Within the R-1 district, each property must have two parking stalls. A third will <br />be required for an ADU. <br /> <br />Tiny Houses: ADU’s must be on a permanent foundation. A “Tiny House” is commonly <br />a temporary structure, similar to a park trailer or fish house. City Code allows these to <br />be stored on property, but not inhabited. In June 2016, the City Council “opted out”, <br />choosing not to permit Temporary Family Healthcare Dwellings, similar to a Tiny House. <br /> <br />What to Expect <br />Based on the experiences of other suburbs, Staff believes there may be a lot of interest <br />in ADU’s, but that may not necessarily translate into permit applications. St. Paul is <br />considering amending their ordinance to allow ADU’s in an area along west University <br />Ave. During their public comment period, residents were equally divided for and <br />against ADU’s. Arguments for ADU’s included; options for affordable housing; and <br />aging in place. Arguments against ADU’s, included; City’s inability of enforcement; too <br />much density and lost green space; detached ADU’s should not be allowed; parking <br />concern; and change in neighborhood character. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends that the Council discuss if ADU’s would be appropriate in Mounds <br />View, and consider any potential concerns. Staff will bring forward an Ordinance <br />Amendment for consideration at the August 8th Council meeting. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />Jon Sevald, AICP <br />Planner
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.