My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-01-2016 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
08-01-2016 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:18 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 12:22:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/1/2016
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/1/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
It’s important to note that cities permit ADU’s differently. For example, Andover allows <br />ADU’s only on lots zoned for 2.5+ acres. Plymouth allows ADU’s only if the home was <br />originally constructed with an ADU. St. Paul allows ADU’s only within carriage houses, <br />but is considering allowing them along the University Ave. LRT corridor. Roseville <br />allows ADU’s as a permitted use, but requires notification of all neighbors prior to <br />administrative approval. New Brighton allows ADU’s only on lots twice the minimum lot <br />size, and only for use by the homeowners’ employees (i.e. nanny, caretaker, etc.). <br /> <br />Since Minneapolis amended their ordinance in 2015 to allow ADU’s, the city has issued <br />50 permits. By contrast, nine suburbs queried by Staff stated that they typically issue 0- <br />1 ADU permits per year (mostly, zero). When Richfield amended their ordinance to <br />allow ADU’s, a number of property owners with illegal ADU’s applied for permits to <br />become legal units, but the city has not received any applications for “new” ADU’s. <br /> <br />The Mounds View Planning Commission has discussed ADU’s extensively. Highlights <br />of these discussions include: <br /> <br />Ownership: Either the home or the ADU is to be owner occupied, and homesteaded. <br />Homestead may include “Relative Homestead”, in which a relative may occupy the <br />home instead of the homeowner. To counter this, some cities have required that the <br />owner record a covenant, requiring homeowner occupation. Staff believe that a <br />covenant is not necessary, and that requiring a condition of CUP approval, that the <br />property be owner occupied is sufficient. <br /> <br />Rental License: If the ADU does not have access into the home, the owner will need to <br />obtain a rental license, and would be inspected by the City every other year. <br /> <br />ADU Size: If the ADU is internal to the existing home (i.e. conversion of a basement or <br />second floor), then the minimum size is 300 sq ft, and maximum size can be no larger <br />than the floor above or below the ADU. If the ADU is to be a home addition, or in an <br />accessory building, then the minimum size is 300 sq ft, and maximum size 800 sq ft. <br />These size limitations are consistent with many other cities. <br /> <br />It is possible that a small house less than 800 sq ft in area could add on an 800 sq ft <br />ADU. The Council may want to consider requiring that the ADU cannot exceed the size <br />of the principal structure (home). <br /> <br />Accessory buildings are limited to a height of 18’ (from ground to roof peak). It is <br />unlikely that an existing detached garage attic could be converted into an ADU (trusses <br />are different if for storage vs living area). A new detached garage could have an ADU <br />above it, but would still need to be 18’ or less in height. <br /> <br />Setbacks: ADU’s are to comply with the same setbacks as homes (10’ side and rear <br />yard setback). <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.