My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2016/10/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
Agenda Packets - 2016/10/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:20 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 12:26:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/3/2016
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/3/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Item No: 4 <br />Meeting Date: Oct 3, 2016 <br />Type of Business: Work Session <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, City Administrator <br />Item Title/Subject: Review Non-Compliant Curb Cuts Widened During Street <br />Improvement Projects <br /> <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />After the City created the Street and Utility Improvement Program, the Council also created <br />a Private Improvement Program whereby residents within project areas could pay to have <br />certain additional work done within the right of way at their own expense. Originally, these <br />improvements included replacement of the sanitary sewer from the main to the property <br />line, installation of new services from the main to the property line, replacing a non- <br />conforming or second curb cut, and, widening an existing curb cut. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />Many residents took advantage of the Private Improvement Program (PIP) to replace <br />sanitary services and to address non-conforming curb cuts. Many others (almost 100) <br />opted to widen a curb cut on the condition that the driveway be widened within a year to <br />match the new, wider curb cut. The original PIP Agreement included the following <br />language, which each property owner acknowledged and agreed to when they signed the <br />agreement: <br /> <br />“Owner agrees to improve the driveway to match the curb cut within one year of the date <br />that construction of the curb cut is completed. Owner understands and agrees that if Owner <br />does not improve the driveway within this time period, the City has the right to remove the <br />Improvements and Owner will be responsible for paying the cost of removal.” <br /> <br />After the City had constructed five projects, it became clear that following up on the one- <br />year requirement for the wider curb cuts would prove challenging, as many property <br />owners had yet to make the requisite improvement to their driveways. As a result, the PIP <br />Agreement was revised for the Area G project to require a $300 deposit as well as a permit <br />in hand for the wider driveway before the City would agree to widen the curb cut. The new <br />language is as follows: <br /> <br />“Owner agrees to pay a $300 deposit and improve the driveway to match the curb cut within <br />one year of the date that construction of the curb cut is completed. Owner understands and <br />agrees that if Owner does not improve the driveway within this time period, the $300 deposit <br />will be forfeited and the City will remove the Improvements. The Owner will also be <br />responsible for paying all additional costs of removal over the $300 deposit.” <br /> <br />The new language has helped to minimize the number of driveways that are not widened to <br />match the curb cut after the project concludes.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.