My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2016/10/03
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
Agenda Packets - 2016/10/03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:20 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 12:26:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/3/2016
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/3/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Curb Cut Report <br />October 3, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Planner Jon Sevald indicates there are only five driveways that have not yet been improved <br />to match the curb cut, however we are double-checking with Public Works to ensure the list <br />is comprehensive. <br /> <br />While some property owners have received extensions from the City for one reason or <br />another, as a matter of fairness to all other owners who have widened their driveways as <br />required, we are at the point now that non-conforming curb cut widths should be removed <br />pursuant to the agreement signed by the resident, at the residents’ expense. <br /> <br />There is one exception to the direction noted above regarding removal of the extra <br />concrete and apron at the owners’ expense: the City is aware of at least one case where a <br />property owner who had requested the wide curb cut sold the property before compliance <br />was achieved, leaving the new owner unaware of the requirement to widen the driveway. <br />In this case, staff would suggest we communicate with the new property owner and advise <br />them of their options. If the new owner does not want to widen the driveway, staff would <br />recommend the curb cut be corrected to match the old driveway and NOT charge the new <br />resident. For all other owners, they would receive notice of the City’s intent to remove the <br />extra curb cut width at their expense if the driveway is not widened by, for example, June 1, <br />2017. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Brian Erickson has requested quotes from the street and concrete <br />contractors to do the work with pricing valid through the end of next year. Any PIP curb <br />cuts left non-compliant would be replaced at the owners’ expense after June 1, 2017. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Review the information presented and confirm whether the proposed course of action and <br />timeline should be pursued. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />________________________ <br />James Ericson <br />City Administrator <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.