My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2008/04/07
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
Agenda Packets - 2008/04/07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:19 PM
Creation date
7/10/2018 4:21:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/7/2008
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/7/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The only way that money would stay in the City is if the City employees were <br />Mounds View residents. Otherwise, the income tax from the employees will go to <br />the state & federal governments, the same as the income tax for consultants’ <br />employees does. <br /> <br />In fact, the same engineering expenses paid to a consultant actually produces <br />more tax revenue for both the state and the federal governments, since the <br />consulting firm has to pay corporation tax. So more money makes it back into the <br />communities. <br /> <br /> <br />Summary of the consideration to perform in-house engineering: <br />In considering the question, it is Staff’s opinion that the following conclusions will <br />be reached: <br />• There is no cost savings to be realized in personnel salaries <br />• There are additional expenses above and beyond personnel salaries that <br />are already included in consulting fees <br />• There are issues in regards to hiring City personnel, including: <br />o Filling the positions <br />o Efficiency of workload <br />o Long term plan for positions <br />o Training <br />• There are other intangible factors that make the consultant approach a <br />referred approach. <br /> <br />Construction Services: In-house proposal <br />There is one area of engineering services that Staff feels that the City would <br />benefit from performing in-house. This is in the area of Construction Services, <br />and specifically, for activities associated with construction coordination and <br />project support services. <br /> <br />The proposal would be for the City to pursue hiring one full-time individual to <br />perform most or all the construction coordination and project support services for <br />the projects associated with the Street and Utility Improvement Program and <br />other public improvement projects initiated by the City. This position would be <br />responsible for coordinating construction activities, address and respond to all <br />customer calls, complaints, and questions, coordinate public input on projects, <br />organize all project neighborhood meetings, work with and perhaps coordinate <br />activities associated with the Streets and Utilities Committee, address and <br />provide direction on all design issues that occur in the field, coordinate permits <br />activities from other agencies, provide project updates and reports to the City <br />Council and posted them on the City’s website, Mounds View Matters, cable TV, <br />and construction phone hotline, and coordinate of the development and <br />implementation of the raingarden program. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.