My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1992 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
10-13-1992 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:32 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 7:52:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/13/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/13/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Page Three <br /> • ular Meeting October 13, 1992 <br /> Councilmember Rickaby asked what the duties of the maintenance receptionist <br /> were because arguments were made at the Work Session for reclassification of <br /> this position was that the duties were greater than those of the City Hall <br /> receptionist. <br /> Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that the duties <br /> of the maintenance receptionist were: phones, scheduling work for the <br /> Public Works workers, schedule final readings, computer entry including <br /> accounts payable, work accomplished reports, fuel usage and other various <br /> reports, all secretarial work and correspondence including filing. <br /> Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed the duties of City Hall <br /> Receptionist as being: accepting and transferring of phone calls, <br /> very minimal work with animal licensing, no typing or secretarial duties as <br /> far as correspondence, and relaying information to staff members. <br /> Minetor stated that the maintenance receptionist position is actually more <br /> like a division secretary's position. <br /> Orduno explained that there are criteria that have to be met in order to <br /> reclassify a position. The positions, when compared, have to have similar <br /> duties, tasks and responsibilities in order to be reclassified to <br /> comparable positions. Inotherwords, if they walk like a duck, they should <br /> 41Fcalled a duck. <br /> Minetor explained that the present Public Works Foreman position is more <br /> like a supervisor's position because he supervises many classes of people. <br /> This position is responsible for supervising personnel in streets, water <br /> department, sewer department, and the division secretary. This position <br /> also works on a maintenance budget and sets maintenance project schedules. <br /> The Public Works Foreman supervises the maintenance division and is given <br /> main guidelines from the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The Public <br /> Works Foreman position is comparable to a Maintenance Supervisor in the <br /> Stanton schedule. <br /> CouncilmemberRickaby—asked—Minetor what— <br /> positions-he-supervised-Minetor responded: supervises personnel in the Planning Department, the <br /> Building Inspector and the Building Department Secretary. <br /> " <br /> Councilmember Rickaby stated that maybe the City didn'tneed a full time <br /> engineer. This was discussed some time ago and Rickaby stated that the <br /> argument was that this position would be too difficult to replace as too <br /> many other people would have to be hired to replace this position. Rickaby <br /> stated that if the Public Works Foreman was doing supervisory work now, that <br /> perhaps the City should look at turning the City Engineer's position into a <br /> half time positionand not having this type of bureaucracy where a <br /> supervisor is supervising a supervisor. <br /> 41,chard Oman, 8205 Groveland Road, offered that when services expand <br /> ersonnel shouldn't be expanded to create a bureaucracy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.