My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1992/10/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Agenda Packets - 1992/10/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:22 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 8:33:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/5/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/5/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT <br /> PAGE TWO <br /> OCTOBER 1, 1992 <br /> It is recommended that the position be reclassified at Step 3 <br /> with advancement to Step 4 in 1 year, Step 5 in two years (each <br /> upon satisfactory performance) . <br /> Current compensation rate is $ 9 . 77/hr. <br /> Planning, Technician <br /> The position of Planning Technician meets both the criteria <br /> mentioned earlier: the duties have changed in complexity and <br /> scope of diversity and the duties currently performed are more <br /> consistent with the duties and responsibilities of a City Planner <br /> (Stanton Classification #161) . <br /> It is recommended that this position be reclassified to City <br /> Planner with the following Step 5 Plan: <br /> Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 <br /> 30, 160 32, 045 33 , 930 35, 815 37, 700 <br /> Current compensation rate is $28, 366 per year. It is recommended <br /> that the position be reclassified at Step 1 with advancement to <br /> Step 2 (with satisfactory performance) at six months, Step 3 at 1 <br /> year, Step 4 at 2 years and Step 5 at year 3 . <br /> Public Works Foreman <br /> This position meets #2 of the previously established criteria for <br /> reclassification. The scope of responsibility, diversity and <br /> complexity of duties is beyond the duties exemplified by a <br /> classification of foreman. <br /> One of the "tests" for reclassification to a higher ranked <br /> supervisory level position is the degree to which the person <br /> coni-stemtly-exhibits-di seret±on-a-ry j-udgem€nt—deci-s ons;conducts <br /> analysis of data/needs/activities, determines options and <br /> independently selects a course of action (within the scope of <br /> position accountability. <br /> Another test is the diversity of responsibility. A Public Works <br /> Foreman rarely supervises a multi-functional crew. The scope of <br /> responsibility is generally limited to a single "division" -- <br /> streets, water, sewer. <br /> The duties and responsibilities of the current foreman are <br /> consistent with and more representative of a higher ranked <br /> supervisory position. <br /> Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 <br /> 37, 680 40, 035 42 , 390 44,745 47, 100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.