Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 9, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> <br />C. Resolution 6948 Approving the County Road 10 Pedestrian Crossing Options 1 <br />Report 2 <br />D. Resolution 6949 Approving the Preliminary Design of Landscape 3 <br />Architecture Elements for the County Road 10 Trailway Corridor 4 <br /> 5 <br />MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To Approve the Consent Agenda as amended. 6 <br /> 7 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 8 <br /> 9 <br />D. Resolution 6949 Approving the Preliminary Design of Landscape 10 <br />Architecture Elements for the County Road 10 Trailway Corridor 11 <br /> 12 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated his concern is that the Resolution does not specify the funding 13 <br />source or cost. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Director Lee explained that within the capital improvement program that passed in August, the 16 <br />trailway plans were approved and adopted. He shared the plan with the Council. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated his concern is that there are many areas in the plan that should be 19 <br />considered further, rather than be voted upon in the Consent Agenda. He suggested the 20 <br />Resolution be brought back for further discussion. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Councilmember Thomas explained that the Resolution does not approve spending money, and 23 <br />that the plans will come back to the Council before any money is spent. She explained that the 24 <br />Resolution approves various elements that will be included in the plan, not authorizing such 25 <br />elements to be constructed. 26 <br /> 27 <br />Mayor Marty said his and Councilmember Stigney’s concern is that such projects do not go 28 <br />forward without Council approval. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Director Lee pointed out for each segment, the feasibility report will come back to the Council. 31 <br />In addition, the plans and specs would come back and the project would have to be ordered and 32 <br />approved by the Council. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the current Resolution is before the Council because it saves 35 <br />money by approving all of the proposed elements that could potentially be used in the design. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Councilmember Gunn agreed with Councilmember Thomas that the Council is approving the 38 <br />preliminary design. She suggested that the elements the City has so far be brought together for a 39 <br />more comprehensive look at the trailway corridor. She said it is a big project and before the City 40 <br />loses sight of the project, a discussion should be held. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated that each segment is made up of many individual elements and his 43 <br />concern is approving all elements. He said he would like to look at each element before they are 44 <br />installed and that his problem is with the vague language of the Resolution. 45