Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council February 12, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Ms. Schovanec indicated that in late November there was information on the boulevard and a 2 <br />note that there could be affected trees. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that there is some minor disturbance directly behind the 5 <br />curb to about two feet and there should not have been disruption to trees. 6 <br /> 7 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that he did review the data that the petitioners sent out. He 8 <br />then said that the City sent out information to the petition area stating that the project would not 9 <br />go forward for at least a year if the petition passed 10 <br /> 11 <br />Ms. Werner indicated that the forester has already designated the trees to be removed for this 12 <br />project. 13 <br /> 14 <br />Council Member Mueller thanked them for their work on the Petition and this is a fine example 15 <br />of community involvement regardless of which side of the issue you are on. She then said that 16 <br />the information is valuable to the City and she appreciates the efforts undertaken on this project. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Rick XXX of 8071 of Red Oak Drive noted that there were only seven people who signed the 19 <br />petition from Red Oak Drive and the petition asked if you were opposed, not if you wanted to 20 <br />stop the project. He then said he thinks the project should go ahead. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Bob Bleeker of 2625 Hillview said that residents need to pay more attention to the surveys. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Barbara Haake of County Road I said that she cannot believe how thorough the petition 25 <br />committee was and what a great job they did. She then said that she wants this project done but 26 <br />she cannot say enough for the efforts that they went through, to do a person to person survey. 27 <br />She further said that she feels that there should be some amending to the Charter to allow for 28 <br />compromise not just stop the project. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Council Member Stigney thanked Anna and her sister for the work and the presentation given 31 <br />tonight. He then said that this is the second time around that a road project has been turned down 32 <br />and the girls have done an excellent job of providing information to Council, and it is now time 33 <br />for the City to look at the information and move on. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Council Member Flaherty said that this is not a Cadillac and the sewer needs to be updated and 36 <br />replaced, that is a large portion of the costs. He then said that costs played a large part in this, 37 <br />especially if someone comes to the door with the costs. He further said that the first street project 38 <br />petition taught the City a lot about public information and doing more meetings but they did not 39 <br />go door to door. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Council Member Flaherty said that this just delays this project for a year, and some of the 42 <br />research will be good in two years when this comes up again. He then said that the barrier curb 43 <br />keeps people from parking trailers on the lawn and group mailboxes were not going to change, 44