My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-24-1992 CC
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
02-24-1992 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2018 2:39:57 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 2:39:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/24/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Outdoor Recreation Funding <br /> Action Alert <br /> Federal funding for state and local park projects is being severely eroded and this affects the <br /> quality of life for all Minnesotans.Following is the background on the decreases in funding <br /> and facts you can use when contacting your congressional representatives and President <br /> George Bush. Act now to help preserve local park facilities. <br /> For more than a quarter century the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund(L&WCF) <br /> has provided much needed funding for federal, state and local government outdoor <br /> recreation projects.Nationally, almost 32,000 state and local government park projects have <br /> been assisted with over$3 billion in grant funds. Minnesota has received nearly$57 million <br /> in L&WCF funds over the years.Projects have been funded in every county and in <br /> hundreds of cities and townships throughout the state. <br /> Through the years,this program has quietly touched the lives of Minnesotans of all ages, <br /> from rural communities to inner city neighborhoods.It has been one of the"cleanest",most <br /> effective federal programs in existence.Best of all,it has not cost the taxpayer a dime. <br /> Why?Because the program is funded through revenues received from federal off-shore oil <br /> leases and from sales of surplus federal property. <br /> During the past several years, the benefits provided local governments by this popular <br /> program have been sharply reduced. Originally, over one-half of the available funds were <br /> earmarked for local government and state park projects.This formula has been drastically <br /> altered over the years, however, so that today less than 10% of all funds are directed toward <br /> local and state government park projects. Most of the funds are now allocated to federal <br /> land management agencies.In Minnesota,for example, annual funding has fallen from a <br /> high of almost$6.5 million in 1979 to a low of just overin is year s <br /> funding will likely approximate that of 1988. Since Minnesota divides its allocation equally <br /> between local and state government projects,the remainder available for local parks is <br /> minimal. <br /> Meanwhile,the demand for local park grants remains very high. In 1990 local governments <br /> in Minnesota submitted grant applications for projects with an estimated total cost of over <br /> $7.5 million. <br /> What can be done to correct this inequity?First, Congress and the President must recognize <br /> the contribution local park projects make to our health and well-being, economy, and <br /> overall quality of life. Second,they must understand that the demand for local park facilities <br /> and the need for federal assistance remains high.Present allocations to the states fall far <br /> below the required levels! <br /> ...continued on reverse side <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.