My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1992/03/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Agenda Packets - 1992/03/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:51 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 2:47:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/9/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/9/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.unds View City Council Page Three <br /> gular Meeting March 9, 1992 <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> Mayor Linke opened the public hearing to consider Wetland Alteration Permits <br /> for Long Lake Road at 7:05 p.m. <br /> Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City_Engineer, stated that because of <br /> the remodeling and mass confusion at City Hall, notices were inadvertently <br /> not published. Minetor stated that according to the City's code, the <br /> Council has the authority to issue wetland permits without a public hearing <br /> if they so desire. <br /> Minetor further stated that the Council had two options with regard to this <br /> public hearing: 1) reschedule it for a date two weeks from tonight, or 2) <br /> proceed with the hearing. Staff recommends rescheduling the hearing for two <br /> weeks from tonight. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to reschedule the public hearing <br /> to consider Wetland Alteration Permits for Long Lake Road for <br /> two weeks from tonight which would be March 23 , 1992 . <br /> VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> •NSENT AGENDA <br /> Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, read the items on the proposed Consent <br /> Agenda. <br /> Councilmember Quick asked that Item 7, replacement of unmarked police <br /> vehicle, be removed from the Consent Agenda for clarification by the Clerk- <br /> Administrator. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Rickaby/Wuori to adopt the Consent Agenda <br /> minus Item 7 regarding replacement of <br /> unmarked_polic-e—vim - <br /> VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrie. <br /> Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, was asked by Councilmember Quick to <br /> clarify Item No. 7 taken from the Consent Agenda regarding replacement of <br /> the unmarked police vehicle. Orduno explained that the reason this item was <br /> removed was because a fund number had not been assigned to this expenditure. <br /> The replacement vehicle should be coded to the Forefeiture Fund. <br /> Councilmember QuickaskedOrduno to explain where-the funds in thisaccount <br /> come from. Orduno explained that these are funds raised from the sale of <br /> items confiscated in raids or drug busts. Orduno further stated that this <br /> fund is used mostly for police items such as bullet proof vests, squad <br /> •.rminals and radios. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.