Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 12, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br />Ms. Crane explained that Mounds View Bowling, Inc., has submitted the City liquor license 1 <br />application materials (to include the application to stay open until 2am per Ordinance 717), and 2 <br />the applicable fees. The notice of this public hearing was sent out to residences within a 350 foot 3 <br />radius, and the Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Mounds View/New Brighton 4 <br />Bulletin. Staff recommends approval pending the payment of the utility bill and a satisfactory 5 <br />report from the Minnesota Department of Criminal Apprehension. The establishment will have 6 <br />another fire inspection when the building ownership is finalized. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Hearing no public comment, Mayor Marty closed the public hearing. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Council Member Flaherty asked if there were any other items for consideration before approval 11 <br />not listed by Staff. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Ms. Crane explained that approval will not be issued until the items listed as contingencies are 14 <br />provided. 15 <br /> 16 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Mueller. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 7021, 17 <br />Authorizing a Transfer of an on Sale Intoxicating Liquor License from Moundsvista, Inc., d/b/a 18 <br />The Mermaid, to Mounds View Bowling, Inc., d/b/a Mermaid Lanes, located at 2200 County 19 <br />Highway 10. 20 <br /> 21 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 22 <br /> 23 <br /> B. Resolution 7030, Authorizing the Exterior Property Abatement at 2263 24 <br /> County Road H2 25 <br /> 26 <br />Housing Inspector Anderson provided an overview of the exterior code issues at 2263 County 27 <br />Road H2. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Staff explained that on February 23, 2006 and in April of 2005 they were notified for the exact 30 <br />same issue but they have not been able to take care of the cleanup this time. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Council Member Mueller asked how long this would take and what the estimate of costs would 33 <br />be. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Mr. Anderson explained that the City has a contract with a towing company to handle the 36 <br />vehicles on the property and provided an estimate of the number of yards of debris to be 37 <br />removed. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Council Member Stigney asked if everything is in line legally so that the City does not get sued. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mr. Anderson explained that, based upon the recommendation of the City Attorney, Staff feels 42 <br />that the legal requirements are being met. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Council Member Flaherty asked whether the property owner is aware of what is going on. 45