My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-04-1992 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
05-04-1992 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:46 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 3:05:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
5/4/1992
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
5/4/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• City's rates would need to remain below private industry in <br /> order to attract residents to the city program. <br /> Option #3 : Contract with a limited number of haulers to service <br /> specified areas of the city (rates and recycling rules set by <br /> contract) ; mandatory service to residents with hauler servicing <br /> their street; either City or hauler could do billing. <br /> Pros: <br /> • City would be assured that all residents have waste service. <br /> • Wear on roads, pollution, and noise of trucks would be <br /> reduced with less trucks on the road. <br /> • Data collection for state and county agencies would be <br /> somewhat sim•lified de•endin• on number of haulers) . <br /> • If city does billing, persons with delinquent bills cou • <br /> have their garbage fees assessed to their property taxes. <br /> • Allows for more haulers to continue business within the <br /> city. <br /> Cons: <br /> • Some residents may be satisfied with their current hauler <br /> and would not want to switch to the one assigned to their <br /> area. <br /> • Loss of some license revenue (could be made up with <br /> administrative fee for billing) . <br /> • Increase in staff work load, especially when program first <br /> begins: answering resident questions, setting up service <br /> plans, etc. Depending upon the number of haulers <br /> participating, the amount of paperwork and time coordinating <br /> efforts among the haulers could be extensive. <br /> Option #4 : Contract with one hauler to service the entire city; <br /> mandatory service to all residents; hauler would do all billing. <br /> Pros: <br /> • City would be assured that all residents have waste service. <br /> • Wear on roads, pollution, and noise of trucks would be <br /> reduced with less trucks on the road. <br /> • Data collec state and—Bounty agencies—would—be <br /> simplified. <br /> • Recycling would be done by one hauler; everyone in the city <br /> could recycle the same items in the same manner - recycling <br /> participation likely to increase. <br /> Cons: <br /> • Some residents may be satisfied with their current hauler <br /> and would not want to switch. <br /> • Loss of some license revenue. <br /> • Hauler billing would likely be more expensive to residents <br /> than city billing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.