Laserfiche WebLink
15147797 772,0 e<91-u-2eLl ,e,24,6-22,- <br /> CAN ORGANIZED COLLECTION REDUCE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND <br /> IMPROVE PUBLIC SAFETY? <br /> Organized collection does reduce nuisance impacts associated with several refuse collectors picking up <br /> waste on the same block. Organized collection reduces wear and tear on roads and improves air quality <br /> because fuel consumption is reduced. Organized collection improves public safety because fewer miles <br /> are traveled by garbage trucks thereby decreasing the potential for accidents. <br /> The expected life of any street or alley surface is related to the traffic which is carried by the street or <br /> alley. The roadway surface is particularly affected by heavy wheel loads. The effect on a roadway of one <br /> refuse truck is equivalent to 1,500 automobiles. This figure has been documented by the Research <br /> Section of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) and is currently used by Mn/DOT in <br /> street and highway design. <br /> In its organized collection efforts, St. Paul estimated to what degree the life of a street can be extended if <br /> refuse collection were organized. The city assumed that if under the current system, where each <br /> household arranges for collection, traffic volume on a given street is 500 cars per day and five refuse <br /> trucks per week, the equivalent traffic on the street amounts to 11,000 cars per week. Under an <br /> organized collection system with only one refuse truck per week, the equivalent traffic on the street is <br /> 5,000 cars per week. The comparison shows that the effect on the roadway by traffic may be substantially <br /> reduced. <br /> Realistically, all streets might not last substantially longer under an organized collection system because <br /> roadway life is dependent upon many other factors than traffic. However, traffic does have a significant <br /> effect upon roadway life. These additional roadway costs are external costs passed on to the city as a <br /> consequence of each household arranging for refuse collection. <br /> The reduced mileage that refuse trucks travel can reduce the potential number of accidents involving <br /> garbage trucks. Reducing the number of miles traveled by garbage trucks reduced traffic congestion and <br /> may reduce the number of accidents. <br /> Emissions of air pollutants would be reduced because garbage trucks would reduce total mileage. The <br /> precise reduction in pollutants as a result of moving to an organized collection system is difficult to <br /> predict because there are both gasoline and diesel powered collection vehicles, and it is difficult to <br /> estimate the reduction in traffic congestion and miles traveled by garbage trucks that would be achieved <br /> by organized collection. The emission rates of pollutants vary according to the speed of the vehicle with <br /> more emissions at lower speeds. Emissions of importance include hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and <br /> nitrogen oxides. Heavy duty diesel trucks also emit particulates, sulfur oxides, aldehydes, and organic <br /> acids. Of particular concern are particulate emissions from diesel engines because they contain <br /> polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons-(PAH)which are known carcinogens: <br /> Organized collection is one of several methods that could improve neighborhood aesthetics. It could <br /> eliminate the unsightliness of containers set out for collection sometimes every day of the week on some <br /> blocks. Organized collection could discourage illegal dumping and stockpiling of unwanted and unsightly <br /> items in backyards because the costs of removal are generally extra where a household arranges for <br /> collection with a waste hauler. Reducing litter, dumping, and stockpiling could contribute to public <br /> health and safety. <br />