My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2007/08/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Agenda Packets - 2007/08/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:44 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 3:35:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/27/2007
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/27/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 9, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br /> 1 <br />Council Member Stigney said that he would like the problem of sufficiency addressed but it 2 <br />could be by Staff, the Charter Commission or Council. The other two things were discrepancies 3 <br />between the language and the flow chart and it is important to correct them. 4 <br /> 5 <br />Council Member Flaherty expressed his support of the proposed Charter amendment and the 6 <br />recommended language on timelines and sufficiency. He feels that the Charter amendment 7 <br />presented should be approved keeping in mind that a subsequent clarifying amendment may be in 8 <br />order. 9 <br /> 10 <br />City Administrator Ulrich and City Attorney Riggs agreed to work on the language to present to 11 <br />the Charter Commission for consideration. 12 <br /> 13 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Continue this Matter to the July 23, 2007 Council 14 <br />Meeting. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Council Member Mueller said that the sufficiency information is set up in the Charter to be fair 17 <br />both to the City and the residents and it does not define what the petition is and she thinks that a 18 <br />definition is one thing but anything beyond that is something that should go before the voters. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that the petitioning procedure and how it is spelled out in the 21 <br />Charter should be corrected. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Mayor Marty agreed that Council will take a vote at the next meeting, one way or the other, in 24 <br />order to keep this from being sent back to the Charter over and over again. 25 <br /> 26 <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 27 <br /> 28 <br /> B. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 793, an Ordinance Amending 29 <br /> the Zoning Code to Eliminate References to the Former PF Zoning District 30 <br /> 31 <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that first reading was heard on June 25, 32 <br />2007. The purpose of the amendment was to clean up the PF Zoning District language and 33 <br />remove it from the City’s Code as well as clarification that towers can be placed on City owned 34 <br />land, not just park land. The second amendment includes the City Forester in the plans for 35 <br />review. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 8:23 p.m. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Hearing no public comments, Mayor Marty closed the Public Hearing. 40 <br /> 41 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Ordinance 793, an 42 <br />Ordinance Amending the Zoning Code to Eliminate References to the Former PF Zoning 43 <br />District. 44 <br /> 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.