Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 23, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br /> <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Crane reviewed that at the January 3, 2006 Work Session, 1 <br />staff provided a report from the Minnesota State Auditor in regard to newsletter publication. In 2 <br />light of this report, Staff recommended to the City Council to adopt a formal policy in order to 3 <br />assist in compliance with future newsletters. Staff added this policy to the Mounds View 4 <br />Advertising Policy, which was adopted by the City Council on November 24, 2003. Staff 5 <br />recommends approval of Resolution 6722 adopting the advertising and Mounds View Newsletter 6 <br />Policy. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Mayor Marty commented that it appeared the report was missing a couple of newsletter dates. 9 <br />Administrative Assistant Desaree Crane stated that the February/March edition was deleted from 10 <br />the list as the deadline has passed. 11 <br /> 12 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6722 Adopting 13 <br />the Advertising and Mounds View Newsletter Policy 14 <br /> 15 <br /> Ayes – 4 Nays – 0 Motion carried. 16 <br /> 17 <br />F. Resolution 6719 Writing Off Uncollectible Accounts 18 <br /> 19 <br />Finance Director Beer explained that during the course of business, the City receives checks from 20 <br />individuals and businesses as payment for services and also bills individuals and businesses for 21 <br />some services. He stated some of these checks are returned by the bank for insufficient funds 22 <br />and some invoices are never paid. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Finance Director Beer explained that with the closing of 2005 and the approaching 25 <br />implementation of new accounting software, staff feels that the NSF checks and uncollectible 26 <br />debts should be written off. Finance Director Beer stated that many of the NSF checks are 27 <br />related to the golf course, and the City will no longer will have any insufficient checks from that 28 <br />entity. He stated that recommendation is for approval of writing off the delinquent accounts 29 <br />receivable. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if all these checks have been submitted twice. Finance Director 32 <br />Beer stated that they have. 33 <br /> 34 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked when is it a misdemeanor. City Attorney Riggs stated that any 35 <br />NSF check is subject to prosecution. 36 <br /> 37 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if staff has tried to collect on any of these checks with that as a 38 <br />possibility of action. Finance Director Beer stated no. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Councilmember Thomas asked how much does it cost to pursue collection. Finance Director 41 <br />Beer stated he would not venture a guess, but imagined it would be quite expensive. He stressed 42 <br />that letters were sent out stating that the individual is subject to prosecution. He mentioned that 43 <br />staff has sent several letters and received no response. 44 <br /> 45