Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 23, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 28 <br /> <br />that staff works hard to satisfy the City’s goals and implement the vision of the Council. 1 <br />Director Ericson stated that staff is excited that there is a great year ahead, and it was beneficial 2 <br />to look back to 2005 to see what has been accomplished and how far the City has come. 3 <br /> 4 <br />Director Ericson stated that one of the biggest things done in the department is to look at, review, 5 <br />and address building permits. He reported the department looks at building plans and works out 6 <br />in the field inspecting building permits. He stated that the budgeted expectation was not met in 7 <br />either 2004 or 2005. He explained that in 2003, the permit value of the building activity was 8 <br />$12.3 million. In 2004, it decreased to $9.4 million. In 2005, Director Ericson stated that the 9 <br />City planned for a decrease as there is not always that big project. Director Ericson reported that 10 <br />in 2005, the permit value of the building activity was $7.9 million. He stated staff had somewhat 11 <br />anticipated there would be a huge project in 2005; however, the permits for Medtronic will come 12 <br />in 2006, and because of this, staff anticipates a banner year for permit revenue in 2006. In fact, it 13 <br />is expected to be higher than any year before. He stated there was a shortfall for permit revenue 14 <br />in 2005. 15 <br /> 16 <br />Director Ericson reported that the Department looks at every expenditure and determines if it is 17 <br />something critical. He stated a firm look was taken on expenditures, and this will be addressed 18 <br />later in his report. 19 <br /> 20 <br />Director Ericson stated that at the end of 2005, revenue was down approximately $12,000 for the 21 <br />department, which included not only building permit fees, but other permit fees such as plan 22 <br />check fees, zoning permits, mechanical permits, plumbing, contractors’ licenses, housing 23 <br />inspections, apartment licenses and all the planning activity that goes along with that. He 24 <br />reported that 100% of the shortfall can be attributed to the building permit valuation decrease. 25 <br />He stated this does not mean the department was less busy and pointed out there was a 10% 26 <br />increase in number of permits. He explained the value associated with the permits was just not 27 <br />as high. Director Ericson reported that in 2006, the department will be supremely busy along 28 <br />with bringing in the revenues to support it. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Director Ericson explained that regarding expenditures, the City’s Community Development 31 <br />Department does not have a large budget, and that any expenditure that goes unspent or a 32 <br />vacancy in the Department makes a large impact. He reported that the Department came in under 33 <br />budget on expenditures, so the revenue shortfall was covered. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Director Ericson stated that the financials for 2005 have not been finalized. He explained that 36 <br />the personnel total did not include the last payroll in the year, so rather than being $33,000 under, 37 <br />it actually was $22,000 under budget. He explained this was due to the Planning Associate 38 <br />vacancy for three months in addition to other minor things. Director Erickson stated that total 39 <br />expenditures were $34,000 under budget from what was anticipated. He stressed that all 40 <br />departments work hard to not spend unnecessarily and do not look at bottom line on December 41 <br />15 to see what can be spent for the rest of year. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Director Ericson reviewed the activity of the Planning Commission, and stated there were 36 44 <br />planning applications, which is slightly more than typical. He added the Commission also 45