My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/02/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/02/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:28 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 4:53:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/13/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/13/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> <br />cost “millions of dollars”. She reiterated this would cost the City $400,000.00 and not “millions 1 <br />of dollars”. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked if they had some assurances that they would come in on budget 4 <br />for the $400,000.00. Director of Public Works Lee replied there were no assurances. 5 <br /> 6 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the way to be sure their numbers were accurate was to do this. 7 <br /> 8 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated there were options available, such as the City of Blaine being an 9 <br />alternative for providing water. He noted the study would look at those alternatives and they 10 <br />could chose which option they wanted. 11 <br /> 12 <br />Mayor Marty stated under the fifth whereas, he asked if this went over $400,000.00 was this 13 <br />stating that they would start dipping into the TIF pool to pay for the rest. Public Works Director 14 <br />Lee responded that was his understanding, but this language came from the Developer’s 15 <br />Agreement. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Mayor Marty stated under first Therefore clause, second sentence, he noted it seemed a little late 18 <br />to be paying for a report to address these issues. Public Works Director Lee replied that exact 19 <br />wording came from a State requirement. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Mayor Marty stated he did not like the idea if it goes beyond the $400,000.00 budget that it 22 <br />comes out of the other City TIFF Funds. He believed this should stand alone. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated they did not have to have this in the Resolution, but the 25 <br />Developers Agreement already had this in, and the Developers Agreement was already approved, 26 <br />so it did not matter if this was taken out or not. 27 <br /> 28 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Stigney. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution ____, a 29 <br />Resolution Authorizing the Preparation of a Preliminary Feasibility Report and Consultant 30 <br />Selection for the Extension of Public Utilities to the Medtronic CRM Development Project. 31 <br /> 32 <br /> Ayes-4 Nays-1 (Mayor Marty) Motion carried. 33 <br /> 34 <br /> B. 7:10 p.m. Public Hearing and Consideration of the Second Reading and 35 <br />Adoption of Ordinance 763, an Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of an 36 <br />Excess Drainage and Utility Easement Associated with the SYSCO Addition 37 <br />Plat 38 <br /> 39 <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that due to actions beyond the control of 40 <br />the applicant, this item and all other SYSCO items previously scheduled for review at this 41 <br />meeting have been rescheduled for the October 24, 2005 Council meeting. Because a public 42 <br />hearing had been set, published and noticed for this particular item, the City Attorney 43 <br />recommends the Council open the public hearing and continue the hearing until October 24, 44 <br />2005. 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.