Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 16 <br /> <br />area to look the same either, and as long as this was coordinated and tied in, he believed they 1 <br />should grant the variance. With respect to lighting, he agreed with staff and noted there were no 2 <br />residential homes in this area and the more light they can get into this area would help create the 3 <br />City Center in a safety zone. He stated the more light the better. With respect to parking, he 4 <br />asked if they had spoken with Walgreens about the possibility of having shared parking. He 5 <br />noted the Walgreens parking lot had plenty of parking spaces and on the outside chance of a 6 <br />tenant creating a parking need, he believed this should be tied into an agreement with Walgreens 7 <br />for overflow parking. Tom Belting stated they had a common easement agreement and they 8 <br />needed to confirm they could use the parking on the east side. He noted Walgreens had put the 9 <br />retention pond on the property and they wanted to make sure the pond embellished on both 10 <br />properties. He stated he did not believe there would be an issue of overflow parking and he did 11 <br />not believe overflow parking would be used that much. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mayor Marty noted the Walgreens was not totally a brick building either. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked of the 8,300 square feet, how much would his business occupy. 16 <br />Dr. Belking replied his business would encompass 2,800 square feet and they have had other 17 <br />businesses interested in this development. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked what type of businesses were they talking to. Dr. Belking replied 20 <br />they had spoken with a dentist and a gift/florist shop. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Tom Belking noted this was an association which would instill pride and ownership in the 23 <br />businesses also. Mayor Marty noted he liked the aspect that this would be owner occupied. 24 <br /> 25 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Marty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6633, a 26 <br />Resolution Approving a Development Review for an 8,300 Square Foot Building at 2395 County 27 <br />Road 10. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Director Ericson asked for clarification on stipulation 3 of the Resolution. Mayor Marty stated 30 <br />they had agreed to placing brick on the back and if that was acceptable to brick the bottom 31 <br />portion of the building. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she wanted this flexible and as long as the materials were 34 <br />consistent, she was not concerned about the percentage of materials. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if the front of the building was going to be all brick. Dr. Belking 37 <br />responded they planned on going all brick, with the only deviation being the pillars. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Councilmember Stigney suggested they add to condition number 2 that the front face of the 40 <br />building shall be 100 percent brick construction. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Councilmember Gunn and Mayor Marty accepted the amendment. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated here was an opportunity to have an all brick building and he 45