My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/02/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/02/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:28 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 4:53:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/13/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/13/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
381
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 16 <br /> <br />area to look the same either, and as long as this was coordinated and tied in, he believed they 1 <br />should grant the variance. With respect to lighting, he agreed with staff and noted there were no 2 <br />residential homes in this area and the more light they can get into this area would help create the 3 <br />City Center in a safety zone. He stated the more light the better. With respect to parking, he 4 <br />asked if they had spoken with Walgreens about the possibility of having shared parking. He 5 <br />noted the Walgreens parking lot had plenty of parking spaces and on the outside chance of a 6 <br />tenant creating a parking need, he believed this should be tied into an agreement with Walgreens 7 <br />for overflow parking. Tom Belting stated they had a common easement agreement and they 8 <br />needed to confirm they could use the parking on the east side. He noted Walgreens had put the 9 <br />retention pond on the property and they wanted to make sure the pond embellished on both 10 <br />properties. He stated he did not believe there would be an issue of overflow parking and he did 11 <br />not believe overflow parking would be used that much. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Mayor Marty noted the Walgreens was not totally a brick building either. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked of the 8,300 square feet, how much would his business occupy. 16 <br />Dr. Belking replied his business would encompass 2,800 square feet and they have had other 17 <br />businesses interested in this development. 18 <br /> 19 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked what type of businesses were they talking to. Dr. Belking replied 20 <br />they had spoken with a dentist and a gift/florist shop. 21 <br /> 22 <br />Tom Belking noted this was an association which would instill pride and ownership in the 23 <br />businesses also. Mayor Marty noted he liked the aspect that this would be owner occupied. 24 <br /> 25 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Marty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6633, a 26 <br />Resolution Approving a Development Review for an 8,300 Square Foot Building at 2395 County 27 <br />Road 10. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Director Ericson asked for clarification on stipulation 3 of the Resolution. Mayor Marty stated 30 <br />they had agreed to placing brick on the back and if that was acceptable to brick the bottom 31 <br />portion of the building. 32 <br /> 33 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she wanted this flexible and as long as the materials were 34 <br />consistent, she was not concerned about the percentage of materials. 35 <br /> 36 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if the front of the building was going to be all brick. Dr. Belking 37 <br />responded they planned on going all brick, with the only deviation being the pillars. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Councilmember Stigney suggested they add to condition number 2 that the front face of the 40 <br />building shall be 100 percent brick construction. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Councilmember Gunn and Mayor Marty accepted the amendment. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated here was an opportunity to have an all brick building and he 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.