Agenda Packets - 2006/02/13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 17 believed the Council has erred in this decision, but making the front all brick was an 1 improvement. 2 3 Councilmember Flaherty stated this was Councilmember Stigney’s personal opinion and he 4 believed the building as proposed was a nice looking building. Mayor Marty agreed. 5 6 City Administrator Ulrich asked if it was the intention to have the three-foot base around the 7 building. Director Ericson responded he would date stamp the plans presented tonight which 8 would be consistent with the site plans presented at tonight’s meeting. 9 10 Ayes-4 Nays-1 (Councilmember Stigney) Motion carried. 11 12 D. Consideration of Resolution 6634, a Resolution Approving a Minor 13 Subdivision (Lot Line Adjustment) between 8123 Pleasant View Court and 14 8117 / 8119 Pleasant View Court 15 16 Community Development Director Ericson stated the owner and applicant, James Benson, has 17 applied for an approval of a lot line adjustment between the properties he owns at 8123 Pleasant 18 View Court and 8117-8119 Pleasant View Court. The subdivision would move the common lots 19 line of 8123 Pleasant View Court south 33.80 feet to meet the most southeasterly corner of 8117-20 8119 Pleasant View court. James Benson owns both properties – he resides at 8123 Pleasant 21 View Drive, and 8117-8119 is a duplex currently being used as rental property. The purpose of 22 the land transfer is to move the property line to correspond with the corner of Lot 6, along with 23 allowing more yard space for Lot 9. 24 25 MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Flaherty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6634, a 26 Resolution Approving a Minor Subdivision (Lot Line Adjustment) between 8123 Pleasant View 27 Court and 88117 / 88119 Pleasant View Court, Planning Case MI2005-007. 28 29 Councilmember Gunn left the meeting at 9:02 p.m. 30 31 Ayes-4 (Councilmember Gunn not present for the vote) Nays-0 Motion carried. 32 33 E. Consideration of Resolution 6651, a Resolution Authorizing the Layoff of 34 Regular Full-time Golf Course Employees and Providing Severance 35 36 City Administrator Ulrich explained that in anticipation of the golf course redevelopment and 37 closing, the City Council adopted a severance package for the three regular full-time golf course 38 employees on August 22, 2005 with passage of Resolution 6585. The consensus of the Council 39 at that time was to allow payout of vacation and sick leave in accordance with current policy and 40 to allow accumulated flextime to be used by employees. The Council also determined that there 41 be additional severance pay of one week per year of service. 42 43 City Administrator Ulrich reviewed Section 4.15 of the City’s Personnel Policy, noting it 44 provides that the “City Administrator, with the approval of the City Council, may lay-off any 45