Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 19 <br /> <br />Mayor Marty inquired if the auctioneer had been informed this auction might not proceed as 1 <br />scheduled. City Administrator Ulrich replied he had. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated as far as “being on the hook”, they funded the golf course anyway 4 <br />and to him he believed they were exclusive measures and whether Medtronic came in or not, he 5 <br />believed they should get out of the golf course business, sell the land and be done with 6 <br />everything. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the timing was theirs to control and should this fall through and 9 <br />they not have the Medtronic development, they had the opportunity to continue the golf course in 10 <br />the Spring. She stated if they made this a non-revenue producing property, the bonds would be 11 <br />due whether somebody else owned it or not. 12 <br /> 13 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if they sell golf course equipment were the bonds due. City 14 <br />Attorney Riggs responded if they discontinued the golf course business, the bonds would become 15 <br />due and payable. 16 <br /> 17 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if they still had income coming in from the billboards wouldn’t 18 <br />this pay the bond. City Attorney Riggs stated they needed to give the City Administrator the 19 <br />option to reschedule the auction and allow further time for staff to research the bond issue. 20 <br /> 21 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the actual dollar amounts was not that important and the bonds 22 <br />were set up as the financing mechanism for the golf course and while they could probably find 23 <br />the money to continue the golf course, the bonds were tied to the financial mechanism. 24 <br /> 25 <br />Councilmember Stigney asked how much was required for the next few years for bond payments 26 <br />and requested the City Attorney to research this further. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated he agreed that if the assets of the golf course were gone, the 29 <br />bonds would be due. Mayor Marty also agreed. 30 <br /> 31 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated they should get out of the golf course business and they had other 32 <br />money available in other funds to pay off the bonds which he believed they should do. 33 <br /> 34 <br /> Ayes-5 Nays-1 (Councilmember Stigney) Motion carried. 35 <br /> 36 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To postpone the Resolution until after the closing and 37 <br />have this be brought back to the Council. 38 <br /> 39 <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated he did not believe this needed a motion. After further review, 40 <br />Mayor Marty agreed. 41 <br /> 42 <br />Councilmember Stigney did not agree and believed they needed a motion. He indicated they 43 <br />needed to postpone this to a specific time. 44 <br /> 45