My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/02/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/02/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:38 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 4:57:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/27/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/27/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
332
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 13, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> <br />other items that may reduce this predicted surplus, and that it is unlikely there will be any funds 1 <br />remaining for Local Government Aid (LGA) or spending purposes. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Senator Betzold stated there will be a bonding bill this year that will affect Mounds View due to 4 <br />the Medtronic project last year and minor corrections needed for language regarding County 5 <br />Road J. He commented that both Ramsey County and City staff are working on that language. 6 <br />He stated that a bill was pre-introduced by Senator Keith Langseth that is separate from the 7 <br />bonding bill to try to get it out as quickly as possible. Senator Betzold urged the City to contact 8 <br />him if there are other things that need to be brought to attention. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Senator Betzold reviewed other issues coming up such as imminent domain, electronic waste 11 <br />recycling, clean water legacy, accessibility to drivers’ license data, and stadium issues. He stated 12 <br />he would love to see attempts to reduce property tax increases, and the restoration of local 13 <br />government aid. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Senator Betzold offered to answer questions, and noted he will be back at the end of the 16 <br />legislative session. 17 <br /> 18 <br />Stan Meyer, 2812 Sherwood Road, asked what is being done to reduce spending. Senator 19 <br />Betzold responded that this was not a budget year and several spending cuts were done in 20 <br />previous years. He explained that of the State’s budget, approximately one-half goes to 21 <br />education, one-fourth goes to human services (i.e. nursing homes), and another $1 billion goes to 22 <br />corrections. He stated there are several demands on the State’s budget. 23 <br /> 24 <br />Mayor Marty asked Mr. Betzold if there will be special legislation to clean up County Road J. 25 <br />Senator Betzold responded that it was part of the bonding bill last year, and the language was not 26 <br />correct when the bonding bill was passed. He noted Senator Langseth is carrying a bill that is 27 <br />separate from the bonding bill that will address this. 28 <br /> 29 <br />Mayor Marty asked if it will be on table to start off the legislative session. Senator Betzold 30 <br />responded the Senate had pre-filing of bills that ended last week, and that nothing can be done 31 <br />until the legislative session starts on March 1, but the bill is out there and expects the companion 32 <br />bill to be introduced in the House. He commented that both the House and Senate will have the 33 <br />bills ready before the session begins. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Mayor Marty stated he hoped the bill would be at the beginning of the session, because language 36 <br />problems were discovered and legislation is required to straighten it out. Senator Betzold 37 <br />responded he did not know how quickly the bill will be brought up because of the legislative 38 <br />session starting late and because the bills from the rural legislators will be discussed first. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked if there were further cuts expected for LGAs. Senator Betzold 41 <br />responded there is not unless the budget forecast shows a large deficit, but this is not expected. 42 <br /> 43 <br />Councilmember Flaherty mentioned that last year Mounds View had $0 for LGAs, and asked 44 <br />how realistic reinstatement is for the future. Senator Betzold explained that LGAs are mainly 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.