Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Item No: 7F <br />Meeting Date: March 13, 2006 <br />Type of Business: CB <br />Administrator Review: ____ <br />City of Mounds View Staff Report <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From: James Ericson, Community Development Director <br />Item Title/Subject: First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 769, an <br />Ordinance Amending Chapter 1008 of the Municipal <br />Code relating to Signs and Billboards <br />Introduction: <br /> <br />Pursuant to the agreement between the City of Mounds View and Clear Channel Outdoor, <br />Inc., certain revisions and updates are necessary to bring the City Code into compliance <br />relative to the agreement, which calls for the relocation of four billboards from the former golf <br />course site to other locations within the City. To accomplish this, Chapter 1008 of the <br />Municipal Code relating to Signs and Billboards needs to be amended relating to the duration <br />of Interim Use Permits, permitted locations of billboards in the community, spacing between <br />billboards and billboard height. At the same time, staff asked the City Attorney to review our <br />Sign Code and provide an opinion regarding consistency with First Amendment issues <br />relative to recent metro area lawsuits. Kennedy and Graven has concluded their review and <br />has provided feedback regarding both the billboard revisions as well as proposed First <br />Amendment revisions. Staff has prepared Ordinance 769 which incorporates these revisions. <br />The changes to the Sign Code are summarized, section by section, in the report below. <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The proposed amendments to the Sign Code are highlighted in blue (if you have a color <br />copy) with deletions struck out and additions underlined in bold. <br /> <br />Section 1: The amendments considered in this section simply eliminate a distinction between <br />commercial and non-commercial language, the crux of the First Amendment issue. For a <br />sign code to be consistent with the free speech doctrine, the provisions and requirements <br />need to be “content neutral,” which is to say the requirements need to relate to the size and <br />location of the sign as opposed to the actual language displayed on the sign. <br /> <br />Section 2: The changes in this section are to the definitions, again removing language <br />pertaining to commercial or non-commercial content. Also considered in this section is the <br />deletion of the definition of a non-conforming sign which is addressed later in the ordinance. <br /> <br />Section 3: Also removes the commercial non-commercial distinction. <br /> <br />Section 4: This section clarifies the language relating to the waiver of a temporary sign <br />permit fee charged to civic groups or religious organizations. <br /> <br />Section 5: This change removes the ambiguity as to what would constitute basis for denial of <br />a license. <br />