My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/03/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/03/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:47:07 PM
Creation date
7/17/2018 5:27:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
3/27/2006
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
3/27/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />used for General Fund purposes. He explained that it is not designated for one particular item, 1 <br />but is part of the pie. 2 <br /> 3 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated it is inappropriate for the City to be speaking on this issue, and 4 <br />that the City has no role in this matter. She stated she disagrees with the North Metro Mayor’s 5 <br />Association position to ask to the City to do this. She stated it is an individual voter’s decision 6 <br />on the ballot. She stated she cannot support something that is within her job description. 7 <br /> 8 <br />Mayor Marty asked if the constitutional amendment would be put on the ballot if it was 9 <br />amended. Councilmember Thomas stated it has to be put on the ballot to be amended. 10 <br /> 11 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated it was already approved during the last legislative session to 12 <br />have it as a ballot measure for 2006. He explained the North Metro Mayor’s Association is 13 <br />trying to rally support of organizations behind them to insure the passage. 14 <br /> 15 <br />Mayor Marty pointed out that the 2006 ballot is asking voters to dedicate 100 percent of motor 16 <br />vehicle sales tax to highways and transit, where at least 40 percent of that would go to public 17 <br />transit. He stated it seems like the metropolitan areas would garner this because there is little 18 <br />public transportation outside of the metropolitan area. 19 <br /> 20 <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that during the last legislative session, it was very contentious 21 <br />about how much should be dedicated to transit. 22 <br /> 23 <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the resolution is asking the City Council to take a political stand 24 <br />on this issue. 25 <br /> 26 <br />Mayor Marty stated he does not want to support something that is going to keep 40 percent of the 27 <br />revenue in the metropolitan area. He stated he has a problem supporting a dictation for all the 28 <br />people in the State. 29 <br /> 30 <br />Councilmember Thomas asked if the Council wants to vote on the resolution or table the motion. 31 <br /> 32 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated tabling the motion would not be appropriate. 33 <br /> 34 <br />MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/GUNN. To waive the reading and deny Resolution 6761 A 35 <br />Resolution Supporting the Constitutional Amendment for Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Dedication to 36 <br />Transportation. 37 <br /> 38 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated this is going to go on ballot and the people of Minnesota should 39 <br />decide. He stated he has a problem supporting it as a Council. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Councilmember Thomas suggested that the resolution should be tabled if the Council does not 42 <br />want to make a political stance. 43 <br /> 44 <br />Councilmember Stigney stated the item should only be tabled if there is something of a more 45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.