My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1991/10/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
Agenda Packets - 1991/10/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:46 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 6:17:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
10/28/1991
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
10/28/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ounds View City Council Page Nine <br /> gular Meeting October 28, 1991 <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Direct staff to go proceed with the renovation of <br /> the City sign not to exceed $4800 with amount not budgeted to be <br /> transferred from the contingency fund. <br /> 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> REPORT OF COUNCILMEMBERS: <br /> Councilmember Wuori - No report. <br /> Councilmember Quick - No report. <br /> Councilmember Blanchard - No report <br /> Councilmember Rickaby - In response to Councilmember Blanchard's <br /> statement entered into the minutes last week, Councilmember Rickaby <br /> wanted to read her own statement to be entered into this week's <br /> Council Minutes . <br /> "Since Councilember Blanchard read a prepared statement into the <br /> minutes of the last Council Meeting in which she attached my <br /> integrity and accused me of malicious libel, I find it necessary <br /> 411 to use this time to read my own prepared statement into the <br /> minutes . <br /> First of all, I believe the audience to this Council Meeting <br /> deserves to know the content and the context of the statement that <br /> was the subject of Councilmember Blanchard's attack. <br /> As Mayor Linke pointed out at the last meeting, he proposed prior to <br /> the October work session that we discuss the possibility of <br /> omitting the Airport Road when the 10/610/County Road J <br /> construction took place. I naively believed that he was merely <br /> suggesting that the connection to the airport be left out, not the <br /> entire access from 85th Avenue to new J andto t-he airport. <br /> Therefore, when I started getting phone calls from my neighbors <br /> telling me that the rumor was that the Red Oak access would be <br /> eliminaited leaving Groveland, Knollwood and Spring Lake Road as <br /> the only access, I mistakenly reassurred them that all Mayor Linke <br /> proposed was the elimination of the airport connection. <br /> However, at the October 7th work session, I learned I was dead <br /> wrong and the rumors were correct. The Mayor was proposing <br /> eliminiating the Red Oak access atthetime of construction. <br /> Phyllis Blanchard agreed with the proosal. In response, I told <br /> the Mayor and Council that many residents of Groveland Road did <br /> not get nvolved when the last 10/610 fiasco took place. However, <br /> they had informed me tht if the rumors were correct, they would <br /> get involved this time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.