Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council Page fp <br /> Regular Meeting October 28, 1 <br /> Councilmember Rickaby's Statement (cont'd) <br /> After the meeting I drew up flyers to inform my neighbors of my <br /> mistake and that the rumors were correct. The statement from the <br /> flyers that Councilmember characterized as a misquote was never <br /> intended to be an exact quote. That is why is was not enclosed in <br /> quotation marks . Rather it was intended as a paraphrase of what <br /> she said. The statement read, "Phyllis Blanchard says she thinks <br /> the brunt of the traffice SHOULD BE on Groveland Road because it <br /> is wider than the rest. " <br /> When Councilmember Blanchard accused me of libel at the last <br /> meeting I asked her to clarify what her words were. This is what <br /> she said, "What I said at that time was: Groveland Road was <br /> built to take more traffic than Knollwood or Red Oak Drive. It is <br /> wider; is built up better. It was the place where with this <br /> intersection coming in the traffic is going to be coming down <br /> Groveland Road. There is no doubt about the fact that Groveland <br /> is going to get more. And that is what I said. I did not say <br /> that it should be. I said that this was the logical road of the <br /> three. It will get more traffic because it was built, it is <br /> constructed at this time to take more traffic . <br /> I stand by my memoray of what Councilmember Blanchard said and the <br /> paraphrase of it in my flyer. I believe any court of law would <br /> find her clarification similar enough to the paraphrase to find NO <br /> false statement involved. <br /> I am not going to apologize for informing my neighbors that the <br /> rumors and there fears were correct and that my reassurances were <br /> mistaken. <br /> Nor do I consider it a "disservice" to put out that flyer to only <br /> part of Groveland as Mayor Linke suggested. I put it out to the <br /> part of Groveland that would be most—ilnpaeted—by tie—e-l-soIng-of <br /> the Red Oak access . According to the sudy done by the City, if <br /> the Red Oak access is closed, the traffic on Groveland will <br /> DECREASE when the interchange goes through. However, if the Red <br /> Oak access is closed, the traffic on Groveland will INCREASE. <br /> However the portion of Groveland south of Sherwood would be least <br /> impacted because of vehicles heading over to Red Oak Drive at <br /> Ardan and Sherwood to access Highway 10 at the traffic light. <br /> Therefore i did not pass out flyers to resident of Groveland South <br /> of Sherwood where Councilmember Blanchard lives . <br /> Nor do I consider the closing of the Red oak access a dead issue <br /> just because the Mayor elected not to pursue it after his <br /> canvassing of the Council at the work session. Part of this <br /> agreement with MNDOT was that the access can be later closed if <br /> the council so requests . If Mayor Linke was bold enough to <br />