Laserfiche WebLink
Agenda Section: 9 <br /> 11 <br /> 702 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION Report Number: 91-93C <br /> STAFF REPORT Report Date: 10-10-91 <br /> STV Council Action: <br /> ❑ Special Order of Business <br /> CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATEOctober 14, 1991 ❑ Public Hearings <br /> ❑ Consent Agenda <br /> RI Council Business <br /> Item Description: <br /> Consideration of Alternative Revenue Programs <br /> Administrator's Review/Recommendation: <br /> - No comments to supplement this report <br /> - Comments attached. <br /> Exp tion/summary (attach supplement sheets as necessary.) <br /> SUMMARY: <br /> As a result of such factors as a weak economy, a loss of State aid, declining real estate values and <br /> restructuring of the property tax formula, municipalities are forced to find additional sources of revenue <br /> to maintain adequate service levels. City staff has engaged in researching other revenue sources that are <br /> user fee based and are fair and equitable. Two options are proposed in this report. OPTION NUMBER <br /> ONE -A Street Light Utility Program and OPTION NUMBER TWO -An Electrical Franchise Fee. <br /> OPTION #1 - STREET LIGHT UTILITY <br /> One of the options proposed as a source of revenue is to implement a street light utility program. This <br /> option is consistent with the recent user fee trend and is a fair and equitable method of distributing the <br /> cost for this service. There are pros and cons associated with this proposed program. Some pros are: <br /> • it is a fair and equitable way of distributing the cost of providing this existing service <br /> • it shifts the burden of this cost from the general fund, which frees up these funds for other purposes <br /> • it can generate enough revenue to perform street light maintenance and improvements <br /> Some unfavorable aspects to this proposal are: <br /> • taxpayers would be asked to pay for a service that has historically been paid for out of the general <br /> fund <br /> • this program could be interpreted as another tax <br /> After researching this issue, comparing other cities programs and assessing Mounds View's demographic <br /> data, the following rate structure is proposed for Council review: <br /> User Fees for Property Classes (monthly) <br /> Residential $1.21 <br /> Apts. $4.82 <br /> Comm/Ind $5.48 <br /> Ints/Char $5.48 <br /> These fees include a five (5) percent contingency. <br /> 404 Oilthik <br /> imothy Cruikshank <br /> Administrative Intern <br /> RECOMMENDATION; <br /> Staff has researched these alternative revenue sources for Council review. <br />