My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1991/06/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
Agenda Packets - 1991/06/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:36 PM
Creation date
7/18/2018 7:15:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
6/24/1991
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
6/24/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Leighton, Karney & Crabtree, P.A. <br /> ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br /> ROSEVILLE PROFESSIONAL CENTER, SUITE 620 <br /> 2233 HAMLINE AVENUE NORTH <br /> ROSEVILLE, MN 55113-5007 <br /> 612/636-9654 <br /> TELEFAX 612/636-2474 <br /> ATTORNEYS TOLLFREE 1-800/899-5859 ATTORNEYS OF COUNSEL <br /> MARK A. KARNEY H. RICK FRITZ' <br /> LEE J. LEIGHTON VICTORIA BEECROFT SZALAPSKI <br /> TODD CRABTREE HARVEY J. RADKE <br /> SCOTT P. HEINS June 12, 1991 CERTIFIED TRIAL ATTORNEY <br /> VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL <br /> Mr. Paul Harrington <br /> City of Mounds View <br /> 2401 Highway 10 <br /> Mounds View, MN 55112 <br /> RE: Chester Glisan Property <br /> Dear. Paul: <br /> I have reviewed the rezoning done by the previous city council <br /> involving the above property. I have reviewed it with Ric, Mr. <br /> Glisan and you. In my opinion, Mr. Glisan's property and the <br /> adjoining piece should be zoned B-3 . <br /> My review of the senate action is it intended to rezone the <br /> mobile home park west of Mr. Glisan's property R-5 . Mr. Glisan was <br /> originally B-3 and not part of the trailer court. There would have <br /> been no need to rezone his property. <br /> The legal description for the rezoning was open-ended and <br /> arguably could include the Glisan property. But I don't believe <br /> the City intended this result. <br /> We should have a new description drawn closing the legal and <br /> excluding the Glisan and adjoining proper y, :s?: cw y,�oul-d-re-gain R- <br /> 5, and then present this to the Council for approval. <br /> Yours truly, <br /> Ma-JOC- \P4IJA,rvur` <br /> Mark A. Karney <br /> MAK: jvh <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.